TPO-53 - Integrated Writing Task
both reading and the lecture are about the high taxes on purchases of cigarettes or similar products. The author of the passage believes that this kind of taxes has a lot of benefits. On the other hand, the lecture think that these benefits do not work as expanded.
Firstly, the author claims that high taxes discourage people to buy these kind of product, that are unhealthy. he says that the smoking has declined with the rise of the taxes. The lecturer challenges the point made by the author. She thinks that this tendency dose not encourage people not to smoke instead it encourage people to buy even more unhealthy and low quality cigarettes, by spending the same money as before.
Additionally, the author mentions that the taxes are fair because of the harm that the product is causing. he says that a lot of people are in the medical centers because of smoking, and this costs are covered by taxes. The lecturer argues this point by saying that it is not fair for people with lower income, where a lot of people who have higher income is paying the same taxes, which is unfair.
Finally, the author makes a point about the revenue that these taxes increase. The believes that this benefits public welfare, such as building stadiums or public parks. Whereas the lecturer thinks that it is just that the government does not want to loose a source of income, and for that reason they do not bend smoking in public places.
In conclusion the reading and the listening are both about cigarette taxes. The lecturer effectively challenged the points made by the author.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Both
both reading and the lecture are about the h...
^^^^
Line 3, column 69, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this kind' or 'these kinds'?
Suggestion: this kind; these kinds
...hat high taxes discourage people to buy these kind of product, that are unhealthy. he says...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 112, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: He
...se kind of product, that are unhealthy. he says that the smoking has declined with...
^^
Line 3, column 312, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'encourages'?
Suggestion: encourages
...ncourage people not to smoke instead it encourage people to buy even more unhealthy and l...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 108, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: He
...f the harm that the product is causing. he says that a lot of people are in the me...
^^
Line 7, column 84, Rule ID: BELIEVE_BELIEF[1]
Message: Did you mean 'beliefs' (noun) instead of believes (verb)?
Suggestion: beliefs
... revenue that these taxes increase. The believes that this benefits public welfare, suc...
^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 97, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... these taxes increase. The believes that this benefits public welfare, such as bu...
^^
Line 7, column 253, Rule ID: LOOSE_LOSE[3]
Message: Did you mean 'lose' (= miss, waste, suffer the loss etc.)?
Suggestion: lose
...st that the government does not want to loose a source of income, and for that reason...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, firstly, so, whereas, in conclusion, kind of, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.4613686534 105% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 5.04856512141 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 7.30242825607 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 18.0 12.0772626932 149% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 22.412803532 134% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 31.0 30.3222958057 102% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 5.01324503311 20% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1312.0 1373.03311258 96% => OK
No of words: 275.0 270.72406181 102% => OK
Chars per words: 4.77090909091 5.08290768461 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07223819929 4.04702891845 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.3379414552 2.5805825403 91% => OK
Unique words: 130.0 145.348785872 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.472727272727 0.540411800872 87% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 405.0 419.366225166 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 3.25607064018 123% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 1.51434878587 132% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 13.0662251656 115% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 21.2450331126 85% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 41.1074472842 49.2860985944 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 87.4666666667 110.228320801 79% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.3333333333 21.698381199 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.86666666667 7.06452816374 83% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 8.0 4.19205298013 191% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 4.33554083885 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.27373068433 94% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0 0.272083759551 0% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0 0.0996497079465 0% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0662205650399 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0 0.162205337803 0% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0443174109184 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.2 13.3589403974 76% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 53.8541721854 115% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.0289183223 83% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.39 12.2367328918 85% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.63 8.42419426049 91% => OK
difficult_words: 54.0 63.6247240618 85% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 10.7273730684 56% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.498013245 88% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.2008830022 89% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.