TPO 53- Many countries require cigarette smokers to pay particularly high taxes on their purchases of cigarettes; similar taxes are being considered for unhealthy foods. The policy of imposing high taxes on cigarettes and other unhealthy products has a nu

Essay topics:

TPO 53- Many countries require cigarette smokers to pay particularly high taxes on their purchases of cigarettes; similar taxes are being considered for unhealthy foods. The policy of imposing high taxes on cigarettes and other unhealthy products has a number of social benefits.

both the reading and the listening materials discuss the policy of imposing high taxes on cigarettes and unhealthy foods. With this in mind, the author states that there are several social advantages in this idea. The lecturer, on the othe hand, refutes all three episodes of arguments mentioned in the passage and believing all the reasons are challengeable.

First of all, while the writer states that this idea is great for people health because discourage them from unhealthy behavior, the professor refutes this claim and believing that, it can even worse people's health condition. She continues that, in this way, people move to buy cheaper and low qualified cigarettes which are more harmfull for their health.

Second, the reading selection points out that this idea is fair because those people who smoking or eating unhealthy foods make more medical costs. Hence, they should pay more taxes. However, the speaker makes it clear that this idea is not fair in essenss because both the smaller income and high earn income who are adict to smoking should pay equally. As a result, the situation will be worse just for low income people.

Finally, the author holds the view that this idea could benefited not only somker ones but also nonsomker people because government can uses this extra revenue into public welfare. Conversely, the professor explains that in this fashion, the govenrment try to keep this extra revenue and avoid to lose it. Therefore, they will try to change some rules for instance allowing people to smok in public and non public places to prevent losing the income.

Votes
Average: 8.6 (1 vote)
Essay Categories

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Both
both the reading and the listening materials...
^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...all the reasons are challengeable. First of all, while the writer states th...
^^^^^^^
Line 13, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...re more harmfull for their health. Second, the reading selection points out...
^^^^^^^
Line 17, column 311, Rule ID: WHO_NOUN[1]
Message: A noun should not follow "who". Try changing to a verb or maybe to 'who is a are'.
Suggestion: who is a are
...the smaller income and high earn income who are adict to smoking should pay equally. As...
^^^^^^^
Line 21, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... worse just for low income people. Finally, the author holds the view that...
^^^^^^^
Line 25, column 58, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'could' requires the base form of the verb: 'benefit'
Suggestion: benefit
...hor holds the view that this idea could benefited not only somker ones but also nonsomker...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 25, column 138, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[2]
Message: The verb 'can' requires the base form of the verb: 'use'
Suggestion: use
...nonsomker people because government can uses this extra revenue into public welfare....
^^^^
Line 25, column 290, Rule ID: ADMIT_ENJOY_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the gerund form: 'avoid losing'.
Suggestion: avoid losing
...ment try to keep this extra revenue and avoid to lose it. Therefore, they will try to change ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, conversely, finally, first, hence, however, if, second, so, therefore, while, for instance, as a result, first of all

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 10.4613686534 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 5.04856512141 139% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 7.30242825607 137% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 12.0772626932 91% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 22.412803532 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 23.0 30.3222958057 76% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.01324503311 120% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1363.0 1373.03311258 99% => OK
No of words: 265.0 270.72406181 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.14339622642 5.08290768461 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03470204552 4.04702891845 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.2968271024 2.5805825403 89% => OK
Unique words: 157.0 145.348785872 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.592452830189 0.540411800872 110% => OK
syllable_count: 408.6 419.366225166 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 3.25607064018 123% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 13.0662251656 92% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 21.2450331126 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.8028915355 49.2860985944 99% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.583333333 110.228320801 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.0833333333 21.698381199 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.6666666667 7.06452816374 151% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 8.0 4.19205298013 191% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 4.33554083885 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 4.45695364238 179% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.27373068433 23% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.126483114212 0.272083759551 46% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0575743508088 0.0996497079465 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0998852516221 0.0662205650399 151% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0846976340701 0.162205337803 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0626840648113 0.0443174109184 141% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 13.3589403974 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 53.8541721854 107% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.0289183223 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.53 12.2367328918 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.72 8.42419426049 104% => OK
difficult_words: 67.0 63.6247240618 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.7273730684 103% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.498013245 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.2008830022 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 86.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 26.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.