TPO 54
In this set of materials, both the reading passage and the lecturer discuss the salinity of lake's water has increased due to the evaporation of water over the years. The reading passage firmly states that there are several methods for controlling and even reversing this trend. However, the professor casts doubt on each of the reasons. He says it would be great if we could impose these solutions, but they are not practical.
Firstly, the article contends that by utilizing the desalination devices, we can separate the salt from the lake's water. On the other hand, the lecturer articulates that the desalination process has some problems. When the water evaporates, the solid materials remains which contains some chemicals such as Selenium which is toxic. As a result, a wind can brings these poisonous materials into the air and brings about some health problems for people.
In addition, the essay alleges that another method to reduce the salinity of lake's water is to dilute the salt's level of the lake with water from other sources such as ocean via pipelines or canals. Nevertheless, the lecturer avers that constructing the canals and pipes from the ocean to the lake is very expensive, and the government cannot afford it.
Eventually, the text asserts that the salinity of the lake could be controlled by constructing some walls and dividing the lake into several sections. Thus, in this situation, the salinity of the central part could be handled. On the contrary, the professor declares that constructing the walls will not work in the long run. Because in that location, there are significant tense geological activities such as earth-quake. Therefore, a considerable earth-quake can collapse the walls, and causes mixing of the waters and increasing the salinity of the largest part.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 357, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[2]
Message: The verb 'can' requires the base form of the verb: 'bring'
Suggestion: bring
...which is toxic. As a result, a wind can brings these poisonous materials into the air ...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, however, if, nevertheless, so, therefore, thus, in addition, such as, as a result, on the contrary, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.4613686534 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 5.04856512141 178% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 7.30242825607 137% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 12.0772626932 91% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 22.412803532 85% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 30.3222958057 106% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.01324503311 140% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1525.0 1373.03311258 111% => OK
No of words: 295.0 270.72406181 109% => OK
Chars per words: 5.16949152542 5.08290768461 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14434120667 4.04702891845 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72101000225 2.5805825403 105% => OK
Unique words: 163.0 145.348785872 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.552542372881 0.540411800872 102% => OK
syllable_count: 470.7 419.366225166 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 3.25607064018 61% => OK
Article: 12.0 8.23620309051 146% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.25165562914 240% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 1.51434878587 198% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 2.5761589404 194% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 13.0662251656 115% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 21.2450331126 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.960101347 49.2860985944 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.666666667 110.228320801 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.6666666667 21.698381199 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.2 7.06452816374 130% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.27373068433 164% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0 0.272083759551 0% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0 0.0996497079465 0% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0662205650399 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0 0.162205337803 0% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0443174109184 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 13.3589403974 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 53.8541721854 97% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.0289183223 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.71 12.2367328918 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.97 8.42419426049 106% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 63.6247240618 129% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.7273730684 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.498013245 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.