Tpo 54
The reading and the lecture are both about the several ways to revers threatening of the lake. The reading passage claims that the lake could survive by taking a few actions that would benefit the lake's health. As opposed to, the professor, who counters argue those viewpoints, trying to prove that those ways do not seem convincing.
First and foremost, the writer mentions that desalination of the water by using special facilities would be a great solution. Lake's water would pump into the facility and heated, as a result of that process, the steam that is formed would be salt free. On the contrary, the professor cannot disagree more, reasoning that the waste of the materials that would come with this process could be even more toxic than the salted water. Consequently, people's life would be in danger because of the breathing of these toxic chemicals.
The second argument the author gives is that diluting the salt level in the lake from the ocean would be another possible solution. The result would be that by exchanging the ocean's water with the lake's water, the level of salinity would drastically reduced. However, the lecturer cannot be more outraged, explaining that to do that local government should spend a lot of money. It is going to be very expensive to build long distancing pipes.
lastly, on one hand the passage points out that dividing the lake by section, by building walls ,would help the reduction of salinity. Furthermore, directing freshwater from small rivers into the main section of the lake would solve the current issue. Nevertheless, the teacher declares that the geographic position where a river and sea are close by, is often appeared to experience earthquakes, which would destroy the walls. So, that this solution is only for a short term.
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 198, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'lakes'' or 'lake's'?
Suggestion: lakes'; lake's
...ng a few actions that would benefit the lakes health. As opposed to, the professor, w...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 251, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'would' requires the base form of the verb: 'reduce'
Suggestion: reduce
...the level of salinity would drastically reduced. However, the lecturer cannot be more o...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 437, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... very expensive to build long distancing pipes. lastly, on one hand the passa...
^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Lastly
...ve to build long distancing pipes. lastly, on one hand the passage points out tha...
^^^^^^
Line 7, column 96, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...g the lake by section, by building walls ,would help the reduction of salinity. Fu...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, first, furthermore, however, if, lastly, nevertheless, second, so, as a result, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 10.4613686534 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 17.0 5.04856512141 337% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 4.0 7.30242825607 55% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 18.0 12.0772626932 149% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 22.412803532 94% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 30.3222958057 115% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 5.01324503311 219% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1494.0 1373.03311258 109% => OK
No of words: 300.0 270.72406181 111% => OK
Chars per words: 4.98 5.08290768461 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.16179145029 4.04702891845 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.5198677214 2.5805825403 98% => OK
Unique words: 175.0 145.348785872 120% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.583333333333 0.540411800872 108% => OK
syllable_count: 450.0 419.366225166 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 3.25607064018 61% => OK
Article: 11.0 8.23620309051 134% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 13.0662251656 115% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 21.2450331126 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 32.6738767553 49.2860985944 66% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.6 110.228320801 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0 21.698381199 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.26666666667 7.06452816374 103% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 4.19205298013 119% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 4.33554083885 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 4.45695364238 135% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.27373068433 47% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.617681337811 0.272083759551 227% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.202430417396 0.0996497079465 203% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.159939908138 0.0662205650399 242% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.352339501157 0.162205337803 217% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.118717618387 0.0443174109184 268% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 13.3589403974 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 53.8541721854 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.0289183223 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.6 12.2367328918 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.68 8.42419426049 103% => OK
difficult_words: 77.0 63.6247240618 121% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.7273730684 98% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.498013245 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.2008830022 89% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 198, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'lakes'' or 'lake's'?
Suggestion: lakes'; lake's
...ng a few actions that would benefit the lakes health. As opposed to, the professor, w...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 251, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'would' requires the base form of the verb: 'reduce'
Suggestion: reduce
...the level of salinity would drastically reduced. However, the lecturer cannot be more o...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 437, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... very expensive to build long distancing pipes. lastly, on one hand the passa...
^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Lastly
...ve to build long distancing pipes. lastly, on one hand the passage points out tha...
^^^^^^
Line 7, column 96, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...g the lake by section, by building walls ,would help the reduction of salinity. Fu...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, first, furthermore, however, if, lastly, nevertheless, second, so, as a result, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 10.4613686534 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 17.0 5.04856512141 337% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 4.0 7.30242825607 55% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 18.0 12.0772626932 149% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 22.412803532 94% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 30.3222958057 115% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 5.01324503311 219% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1494.0 1373.03311258 109% => OK
No of words: 300.0 270.72406181 111% => OK
Chars per words: 4.98 5.08290768461 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.16179145029 4.04702891845 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.5198677214 2.5805825403 98% => OK
Unique words: 175.0 145.348785872 120% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.583333333333 0.540411800872 108% => OK
syllable_count: 450.0 419.366225166 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 3.25607064018 61% => OK
Article: 11.0 8.23620309051 134% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 13.0662251656 115% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 21.2450331126 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 32.6738767553 49.2860985944 66% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.6 110.228320801 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0 21.698381199 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.26666666667 7.06452816374 103% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 4.19205298013 119% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 4.33554083885 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 4.45695364238 135% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.27373068433 47% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.617681337811 0.272083759551 227% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.202430417396 0.0996497079465 203% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.159939908138 0.0662205650399 242% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.352339501157 0.162205337803 217% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.118717618387 0.0443174109184 268% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 13.3589403974 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 53.8541721854 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.0289183223 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.6 12.2367328918 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.68 8.42419426049 103% => OK
difficult_words: 77.0 63.6247240618 121% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.7273730684 98% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.498013245 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.2008830022 89% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.