TPO 54
How to reverse the lake salty trend is the focus of both the writer and the professor. The salty lake result from the evaporation is faster than rainfall, which will make the lake on langer have any fish or birds live. In writing to solve the problem, three solutions, including evaporating water, adding ocean water, and building walls in the water have been elaborated. The professor, however, claims that these methods are unrealistic and unpractical.
As opposed to the writer's idea that directly removing the salt, the professor states that it will cause other problems, she advances the theory by saying that by pumping the water and evaporating them, the salty material will remain but other toxic chemicals are also left behind like silicon, which will make serious health risk if it releases to air, people who breathe in well get sick.
The professor continues to discredit the writer's assertion that brings ocean water, which only contains 20 percent or even lower salty, into the lake, by examining the fact that this way needs to use devices like pipelines and canals, but the local government who don't have sufficient resources to do this. And the ocean is at least 1000km away, so which is extremely expensive to add the ocean water into the lake.
It is the professor's third argument that building walls won't last a long time, which contradicts the view of the writer that constricting several walls to separate the salty water and the salt-free water. She contends that this way is unlikely because this region has frequent geographic activists, like earthquakes, which will destroy the wall. Once the walls are collapsed, the water used to be separated will back to its original state again, the movement is labor without results.
An apparent divide exists between the writer and the professor on the way to solving the salty lake problems.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 19, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'writers'' or 'writer's'?
Suggestion: writers'; writer's
...tic and unpractical. As opposed to the writers idea that directly removing the salt, t...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 42, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'writers'' or 'writer's'?
Suggestion: writers'; writer's
...he professor continues to discredit the writers assertion that brings ocean water, whic...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 265, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...nd canals, but the local government who dont have sufficient resources to do this. A...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, so, third, well, at least
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.4613686534 115% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 5.04856512141 119% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 7.30242825607 164% => OK
Relative clauses : 17.0 12.0772626932 141% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 22.412803532 94% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 30.3222958057 106% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.01324503311 100% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1552.0 1373.03311258 113% => OK
No of words: 312.0 270.72406181 115% => OK
Chars per words: 4.97435897436 5.08290768461 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.20279927342 4.04702891845 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.43977424291 2.5805825403 95% => OK
Unique words: 183.0 145.348785872 126% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.586538461538 0.540411800872 109% => OK
syllable_count: 476.1 419.366225166 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 3.25607064018 92% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.51434878587 198% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 2.5761589404 155% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 13.0662251656 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 28.0 21.2450331126 132% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 92.2891610981 49.2860985944 187% => OK
Chars per sentence: 141.090909091 110.228320801 128% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.3636363636 21.698381199 131% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.45454545455 7.06452816374 63% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 4.19205298013 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 4.33554083885 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.27373068433 94% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.360323895024 0.272083759551 132% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.139253440667 0.0996497079465 140% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.070346571626 0.0662205650399 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.192229893598 0.162205337803 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0761040585897 0.0443174109184 172% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.2 13.3589403974 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.52 53.8541721854 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 11.0289183223 118% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.84 12.2367328918 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.97 8.42419426049 106% => OK
difficult_words: 78.0 63.6247240618 123% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.7273730684 103% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.498013245 126% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 88.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 26.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.