TPO 54- Integrated
The main idea of both the passage and the talk is about the possibility of reducing the amount of salinity in the inland lake. The author provides three viable solutions for the mentioned problem to prevent the threatening effects of salinity for marine animals. The lecturer challenges all the mentioned ways and thinks that none of solutions is practical.
Firstly, the author states that by using special desalination facilities, the salt can be removed from inland lake. The lecturer, on the contrary, points out that desalination process can lead to various detrimental consequences. In this regard, she says that the some solid materials that are leaved behind after desalination could be very dangerous for human health if they scatter in the air.
Furthermore, the author asserts that transferring water from the ocean to lake can reduce the salt level since Pacific Ocean is 20 percent less salty than water in the lake. The speaker, in contrast, explains that construction of pipelines and channels are very challenging process, and it requires a great amount of money which is not affordable for the government. Because the distance between Pacific Ocean and lake is about 100km, it is not a practical way to pump water from the ocean.
Eventually, the author mentions that dividing the lake to small parts can be effective way to control the main lake's salinity. The lecturer, on the other hand, rebuts this claims and posits that the mentioned solution will not be efficacious since the wall will be destroyed by natural activities such as earthquake. Thus, the water for all the small sections will be mixed with the main lake.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 264, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...effects of salinity for marine animals. The lecturer challenges all the mentioned w...
^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...that none of solutions is practical. Firstly, the author states that by using...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 270, Rule ID: THE_SOME_DAY[1]
Message: Did you mean 'same'?
Suggestion: same
...nces. In this regard, she says that the some solid materials that are leaved behind ...
^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...n health if they scatter in the air. Furthermore, the author asserts that tra...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 84, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ransferring water from the ocean to lake can reduce the salt level since Pacific ...
^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...al way to pump water from the ocean. Eventually, the author mentions that div...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 119, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'lakes'' or 'lake's'?
Suggestion: lakes'; lake's
...an be effective way to control the main lakes salinity. The lecturer, on the other ha...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, furthermore, if, so, thus, in contrast, such as, on the contrary, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 10.4613686534 134% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 5.04856512141 158% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 7.30242825607 82% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 12.0772626932 83% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 22.412803532 67% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 30.3222958057 112% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.01324503311 140% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1376.0 1373.03311258 100% => OK
No of words: 272.0 270.72406181 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.05882352941 5.08290768461 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.06108636974 4.04702891845 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.68082780026 2.5805825403 104% => OK
Unique words: 149.0 145.348785872 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.547794117647 0.540411800872 101% => OK
syllable_count: 419.4 419.366225166 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 3.25607064018 61% => OK
Article: 11.0 8.23620309051 134% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 2.5761589404 155% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 13.0662251656 92% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 21.2450331126 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.2758967128 49.2860985944 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.666666667 110.228320801 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.6666666667 21.698381199 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.66666666667 7.06452816374 123% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 4.19205298013 167% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.27373068433 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0 0.272083759551 0% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0 0.0996497079465 0% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0662205650399 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0 0.162205337803 0% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0443174109184 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 13.3589403974 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 53.8541721854 107% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.0289183223 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.36 12.2367328918 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.2 8.42419426049 109% => OK
difficult_words: 77.0 63.6247240618 121% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.7273730684 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.498013245 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.