TPO-56
The author of the passage argues that the existence of the unusual 52-hertz whale could be explaned in three possible ways. Nevertheless, the professor in the lecture disagrees and insists all three explainations are flawed.
Firstly, the author believes that the 52-hertz whale could be a hybrid of two different whale species, leading to a special vioce that is different from both parents. Nonetheless, the speaker holds that the hybrid theory could not stand. Unlike other hybrid whales, who often migrate tegother with other normal whales, the 52-hertz whale not only treavels along but also choose a rount that is different from any other know whale species. The untypical behavior suggests that this whale is nothing close to a hybrid.
Secondly, the author assumes that this percicular whale suffered from a damaged sense of hearing, thus making it songs special. However, the speaker asserts that this theory is also not sound. The loss of hearing could not illustarte the higher pitch of the 52-hertz whale. It is not dout that higher pitch requires different sturcture of thorat, which has not connection with the hearing, As a result, assumption about a damged sense of hearing is iloagical.
Thirdly, the author also mentions the possiblility that this whale belongs to a rare, unknown species hence their songs were never detected before. Nevertheless, the speaker rolls out this arguement as well. No matter how rere the 52-hertz whale is, it musts have parents who belongs to the same specials. Considering the fact that scientists have detected songs of whales for decades, the songs of the 52-hertz whale's parents must have been captured if they ever existed. Consiquently, it is unreasonable to conclude that the 52-hertz whale belongs to any species.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, hence, however, if, nevertheless, nonetheless, second, secondly, so, third, thirdly, thus, well, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 10.4613686534 124% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 5.04856512141 99% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 7.30242825607 27% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 15.0 12.0772626932 124% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 22.412803532 103% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 30.3222958057 92% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.01324503311 80% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1499.0 1373.03311258 109% => OK
No of words: 287.0 270.72406181 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.22299651568 5.08290768461 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11595363751 4.04702891845 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.56390597713 2.5805825403 99% => OK
Unique words: 151.0 145.348785872 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.526132404181 0.540411800872 97% => OK
syllable_count: 439.2 419.366225166 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 3.25607064018 92% => OK
Article: 12.0 8.23620309051 146% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 13.0662251656 115% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 21.2450331126 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.7330849471 49.2860985944 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.9333333333 110.228320801 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.1333333333 21.698381199 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.0 7.06452816374 127% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 4.19205298013 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 4.33554083885 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.27373068433 187% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0 0.272083759551 0% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0 0.0996497079465 0% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0662205650399 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0 0.162205337803 0% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0443174109184 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 13.3589403974 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 53.8541721854 113% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.0289183223 86% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.0 12.2367328918 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.49 8.42419426049 101% => OK
difficult_words: 71.0 63.6247240618 112% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.7273730684 98% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.498013245 91% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.2008830022 116% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.