TPO
The lecture and the reading both discuss the research on actual animal tissues, particularly some discoveries about leg bone of T. rex, one species of dinosaur. While the reading states that the research on T rex's leg bone demonstrates some actual tissues, the lecture refutes this, saying that the reasons are not reliable.
First, the author asserts that the interior discoveries of bone confirm the presence of the branching channels that may be related to the blood vessels, and also finding of flexible organic material was focal point of exploration. Nonetheless, the professor finds this assessment questionable by bringing up the fact that these flexible materials are not certainly the remains of blood vessels. Furthermore, according to the professor, when an animal dies, bacteria colonyze in hollows after long time and the finding of the researchers may be only what is the bacteria left.
In addition, the reading makes the argument that the microscopic examination of inside of the bone illustrated spheres that would be the remains of red blood cells. The lecture counters this point by stating the researchers found this sphere in other animals fossils in that part, which there were no red blood cells in that part when they were alive. According to the professor, this sphere cannot be belong to the red blood cells and it can be made when the animal dies.
Finally, the writer holds that the tests of the scientists show that the dinosaur leg bone contained collagen. In contrast, the professor contradicts this assertion by stating that according to the researchs the collagen cannot remain more than one hundred thousand years. Moreover, the professor says the collagen could be come from other sources like researchers' skin, based on the fact that the human skin contains collagen.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...hat the reasons are not reliable. First, the author asserts that the inter...
^^
Line 9, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...be only what is the bacteria left. In addition, the reading makes the argum...
^^
Line 13, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... can be made when the animal dies. Finally, the writer holds that the tests...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, finally, first, furthermore, may, moreover, nonetheless, so, while, in addition, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.4613686534 115% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 5.04856512141 139% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 7.30242825607 55% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 17.0 12.0772626932 141% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 22.412803532 98% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 30.3222958057 112% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.01324503311 140% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1529.0 1373.03311258 111% => OK
No of words: 294.0 270.72406181 109% => OK
Chars per words: 5.20068027211 5.08290768461 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14082457966 4.04702891845 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.6296894849 2.5805825403 102% => OK
Unique words: 157.0 145.348785872 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.534013605442 0.540411800872 99% => OK
syllable_count: 450.0 419.366225166 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 3.25607064018 31% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 2.5761589404 155% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 13.0662251656 92% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 21.2450331126 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.2578623676 49.2860985944 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 127.416666667 110.228320801 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.5 21.698381199 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.16666666667 7.06452816374 116% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 4.19205298013 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 4.33554083885 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.27373068433 140% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0 0.272083759551 0% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0 0.0996497079465 0% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0662205650399 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0 0.162205337803 0% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0443174109184 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.3 13.3589403974 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 53.8541721854 103% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.0289183223 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.18 12.2367328918 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.75 8.42419426049 104% => OK
difficult_words: 73.0 63.6247240618 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 10.7273730684 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.498013245 110% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.2008830022 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.