Yellow cedar in northwestern North America
The reading and the lecture both discuss the theories about decreasing the population of the yellow cedar, a type of tree existence in America. By presenting three theories, the reading passage explains this reduction of yellow cedar population. However, the lecture rejects all of them, saying that these reasons are not enough to being aware of this declination.
First, the article asserts that cedar bark beetle is a suitable candidate for declining of the cedar tree. According to the author some document is available about this kind of insect strange atacking to the yellow cedar tree. Nevertheless, the professor finds this hypotheses questionable, by bringing up the fact that the healthy cedar trees are much more durable than other trees to this insect. Furthermore, he alleges that almost always these insects atack to the sick trees, which they will die with the attack or not incrusian of them.
In addition, the reading states that the other reason for yellow cedar population reduction would be the brown beers, and that is because they claw these trees to use their high sugar available in tree bark. On the contrary, the lecture contends that beers cannot be the acceptable reason for this subject. He states that the brown beers are distributed all over that area including main land and island. According to the professor there are no beers in the island zone whereas, the population of the cedars are reducing there too. All in all, the cedar tree will be decreased with or without beers.
Finally, the writer asserts that the sever change in climate can be the other reason for this event. He implies that climate changes have affected the root systems of this species of tree and can have significant results. In contrast, the lecture refutes this allege, saying that the yellow cedars are much more dying in low elevations that are warmer that high elevation. While according to the reading's theory the reduction process should be faster in high elevation, but in fact the declining occurrence is more common in warmer area.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...o being aware of this declination. First, the article asserts that cedar ba...
^^
Line 5, column 264, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...tree. Nevertheless, the professor finds this hypotheses questionable, by bringing up...
^^^^
Line 9, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e attack or not incrusian of them. In addition, the reading states that the...
^^
Line 13, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e decreased with or without beers. Finally, the writer asserts that the sev...
^^^
Line 13, column 400, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'readings'' or 'reading's'?
Suggestion: readings'; reading's
... high elevation. While according to the readings theory the reduction process should be ...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, furthermore, however, if, nevertheless, so, whereas, while, in addition, in contrast, in fact, kind of, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 10.4613686534 163% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 5.04856512141 139% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 7.30242825607 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 12.0772626932 124% => OK
Pronoun: 34.0 22.412803532 152% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 40.0 30.3222958057 132% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 5.01324503311 279% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1722.0 1373.03311258 125% => OK
No of words: 342.0 270.72406181 126% => OK
Chars per words: 5.0350877193 5.08290768461 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.30037696126 4.04702891845 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.44225397813 2.5805825403 95% => OK
Unique words: 173.0 145.348785872 119% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.505847953216 0.540411800872 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 522.0 419.366225166 124% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 3.25607064018 92% => OK
Article: 12.0 8.23620309051 146% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.51434878587 132% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 2.5761589404 272% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 13.0662251656 122% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 21.2450331126 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.6598332586 49.2860985944 68% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.625 110.228320801 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.375 21.698381199 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.75 7.06452816374 124% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 4.19205298013 119% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 4.33554083885 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 4.45695364238 135% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.27373068433 164% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.171791433179 0.272083759551 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0679378301347 0.0996497079465 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0715164598419 0.0662205650399 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.121672566984 0.162205337803 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0548218520546 0.0443174109184 124% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 13.3589403974 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 53.8541721854 109% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.0289183223 93% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.95 12.2367328918 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.56 8.42419426049 102% => OK
difficult_words: 84.0 63.6247240618 132% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.7273730684 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.498013245 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
Rates: 65.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 19.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.