tpo 6
online encyclopedias
The listening and the reading materials have a debate on being authentic the online encyclopedias. The penman puts forward 3 main hypotheses, which are refuted by following orator.
First of all, the writer proposes that since public with various level of knowledge can add to the information on this reference, it can not be scientific and may include errors. On the contrary, the speaker views this issue from opposite angle. According to her, correcting error is doable in online encyclopedias. because the printed ones'errors can not been easily revised.
The second point offered by the author is that hackers can change online information, but printed ones can not interfered. On the other hand, the professor casts doubt on this assumption by saying that reed-only format makes it possible that crucial facts be reliable. In addition, some persons's job is monitoring the accuracy of that kind of data.
Last, the reading passage suggests that various subjects about a certain matter make it confuse able source for users. However, the lecturer holds a different perspective. She explains that in printed type only academic elites decide what kind of knowledge be available in references, but in online one, there are great diversity of interests and this point is a big advantage.
In all, the ideas mentioned in the speech counter the opinions in the text according to above reasons.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 317, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Because
...rror is doable in online encyclopedias. because the printed oneserrors can not been eas...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 317, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “because” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...rror is doable in online encyclopedias. because the printed oneserrors can not been eas...
^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 112, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[3]
Message: The verb 'can' requires base form of the verb: 'interfere'
Suggestion: interfere
...e information, but printed ones can not interfered. On the other hand, the professor casts...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, may, second, so, then, in addition, kind of, first of all, on the contrary, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.4613686534 105% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 5.04856512141 119% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 7.30242825607 68% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 12.0772626932 66% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 16.0 22.412803532 71% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 30.3222958057 102% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.01324503311 100% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1188.0 1373.03311258 87% => OK
No of words: 226.0 270.72406181 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.25663716814 5.08290768461 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.87727950738 4.04702891845 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73031797203 2.5805825403 106% => OK
Unique words: 145.0 145.348785872 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.641592920354 0.540411800872 119% => OK
syllable_count: 369.9 419.366225166 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 3.25607064018 61% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.51434878587 132% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 2.5761589404 194% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 13.0662251656 99% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 21.2450331126 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 45.0920163757 49.2860985944 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 91.3846153846 110.228320801 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.3846153846 21.698381199 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.07692307692 7.06452816374 128% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 4.19205298013 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 4.33554083885 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.27373068433 164% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0 0.272083759551 0% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0 0.0996497079465 0% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0662205650399 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0 0.162205337803 0% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0443174109184 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 13.3589403974 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 53.8541721854 101% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.0289183223 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.93 12.2367328918 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.23 8.42419426049 110% => OK
difficult_words: 68.0 63.6247240618 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 10.7273730684 65% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.498013245 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.