tpo 70
The reading passage states that the large bony crests on top of Lambeosaurs' heads might have been certain functions and provides three theories to support the idea. The professor, however, casts doubt on each theory proposed by the reading and says that there are no clear and real functions for the bony crests.
First, the author mentions that the crests improve the dinosaurs' sense of smell because of their similarity to the nose bones of modern animals. On the other hand, the lecturer refutes this argument and claims that it is not supported by their brains because of a lack of well-develop nerves. The nerves detect the smell and Lambeosaurs brain cavity is too small to support this complicated brain. As a result, it does not seem the crests could improve the sense of smell.
Second, the article asserts that the crests prevented overheating by lowering Lambeosaurs' body temperature like Stegosaurs. On the contrary, the listening material repudiates this theory and explains that Stegosaurs had lots of bony crests plates on their bodies, helping them lower their body temperature. In contrast, Lambeosaurs just had one small crests on their head. So they could not benefit from this like Stegosaurs.
Third, the reading avers that Lambeosaurs used the crests to make sounds for communication because they had a good sense of hearing. Conversely, the professor contends that all Lambeosaurs had the crests, but not all of them had a sense of hearing. The scientists just have funded one Lambeosaur having a sense of hearing. As a result, due to the lack of evidence, scientists should be skeptical about this theory.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, conversely, first, however, second, so, third, well, in contrast, as a result, on the contrary, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 10.4613686534 48% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 5.04856512141 79% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 7.30242825607 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 12.0772626932 66% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 24.0 22.412803532 107% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 30.3222958057 102% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 5.01324503311 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1370.0 1373.03311258 100% => OK
No of words: 269.0 270.72406181 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.09293680297 5.08290768461 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0498419064 4.04702891845 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.64671483768 2.5805825403 103% => OK
Unique words: 143.0 145.348785872 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.531598513011 0.540411800872 98% => OK
syllable_count: 395.1 419.366225166 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 3.25607064018 31% => OK
Article: 10.0 8.23620309051 121% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 13.0662251656 107% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 21.2450331126 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.491517751 49.2860985944 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.8571428571 110.228320801 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.2142857143 21.698381199 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.42857142857 7.06452816374 119% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 4.19205298013 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 4.33554083885 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.27373068433 94% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0669060805522 0.272083759551 25% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0241942875894 0.0996497079465 24% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0286094591964 0.0662205650399 43% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0437891607573 0.162205337803 27% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0309818408908 0.0443174109184 70% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 13.3589403974 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 53.8541721854 113% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.0289183223 86% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.24 12.2367328918 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.28 8.42419426049 98% => OK
difficult_words: 63.0 63.6247240618 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 10.7273730684 121% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.498013245 91% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.2008830022 116% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.