tpo integrated 28
The main idea of the both the reading passage and the lecture is the claim of Peary to have reached the north pole in 1909. With this in mind, the reading states that there are several stronge reasons to support his truth. The lecturer, on the other hand, refutes all three episodes of arguments mentioned in the reading, believing that there are not solid evidence and those reasons are not convincing.
First, the writer argues that a committe of National Geographic Society held to evaluate his records and equipments. The committee declared he had reached the north pole at the claimed date. Conversely, the professor makes it clear that members of the committe were his close friends and those invested on his work. Hence, it seems that their conclusion biased.
Second, while the reading argues that some recent expeditions, for instance Tom Avery, reached the north pole in less than 37 days by using the same equipment, the speaker contradicts this reason. In this case, he discribes that the conditions of Tom Avery and Peary expeditions were not same. As a result, we can't accept Peary's claim just by investigating Avery expedition.
Finally, both the text and the listening materials discuss the analysis of photos Peary taked and now are available. In this case, the author explains that the Sun's position in the Ny can be calculated by alaysis of the shadow in the photos. The result of this analysis strongly proves that he reached the north pole and tooked the photos by himself. Howevere, the professor mentions that those photos not prove any things. he continues that the used camera was primitive and the photos fade over time and look blured. So it cannot be used to measure the Sun's position.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 311, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
...editions were not same. As a result, we cant accept Pearys claim just by investigati...
^^^^
Line 6, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ust by investigating Avery expedition. Finally, both the text and the listening...
^^^
Line 7, column 425, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: He
...that those photos not prove any things. he continues that the used camera was prim...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
conversely, finally, first, hence, however, look, second, so, while, for instance, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.4613686534 96% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 5.04856512141 40% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 7.30242825607 137% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 12.0772626932 91% => OK
Pronoun: 33.0 22.412803532 147% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 30.0 30.3222958057 99% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.01324503311 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1431.0 1373.03311258 104% => OK
No of words: 292.0 270.72406181 108% => OK
Chars per words: 4.90068493151 5.08290768461 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13376432452 4.04702891845 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.43915207497 2.5805825403 95% => OK
Unique words: 164.0 145.348785872 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.561643835616 0.540411800872 104% => OK
syllable_count: 444.6 419.366225166 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 3.25607064018 123% => OK
Article: 10.0 8.23620309051 121% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 2.5761589404 155% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 13.0662251656 122% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 21.2450331126 85% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 39.372370944 49.2860985944 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 89.4375 110.228320801 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.25 21.698381199 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.0625 7.06452816374 100% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 4.19205298013 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.27373068433 140% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.425874412295 0.272083759551 157% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.122005080072 0.0996497079465 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.11948872278 0.0662205650399 180% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.241168226881 0.162205337803 149% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0792658633593 0.0443174109184 179% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.8 13.3589403974 81% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 53.8541721854 115% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.0289183223 83% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.14 12.2367328918 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.75 8.42419426049 104% => OK
difficult_words: 78.0 63.6247240618 123% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 10.7273730684 84% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.498013245 88% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.