TPO INTEGRATED 47
There has been some debates among whether the pterosaures are able to glide or to power flight. The lecture says that the pretasours were have the ability to power flight. On the other hand the reading refutes saying that there are several arguments against their power flight.
The first point of dispute is that whether the pterasous metabolism supply them with the sufficient amount of energy for their power flight. The lecture says that some fossils found indicated that the pterasoures had furs and hair like warm blooded animals, which helped them to fast their rate of metabolism and provided them with the energy needed for their power flight. However the reading contends this point by stating that they are considered to be cold blooded animals, thus they have low metabolism and they were not able for power flight.
Another controversial issue is the large size of the petratures. The lecture claims that the anatomical features of the petraturea indicated that they had shallow bones. Their weight were too light so they were able for flapping. The reading contradicts this point by stating that they were too heavy to stay a loft for any length of time.
The final point of dispute is the ptreatures ability to take off from the ground. The lectures asserts that they were different from the other birds. They used their four limbs to take off from the ground. In contrast, the reading argues that they should had large big muscles to hold them of the ground because they were like birds only use two limbs to take off the ground.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 134, Rule ID: WERE_VBB[1]
Message: Did you mean 'where' or 'we'?
Suggestion: where; we
...t. The lecture says that the pretasours were have the ability to power flight. On th...
^^^^
Line 1, column 139, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'had'.
Suggestion: had
...e lecture says that the pretasours were have the ability to power flight. On the oth...
^^^^
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...arguments against their power flight. The first point of dispute is that wheth...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 61, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...of dispute is that whether the pterasous metabolism supply them with the sufficie...
^^
Line 4, column 115, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...upply them with the sufficient amount of energy for their power flight. The lect...
^^
Line 4, column 127, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ith the sufficient amount of energy for their power flight. The lecture says tha...
^^
Line 4, column 382, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: However,
...e energy needed for their power flight. However the reading contends this point by stat...
^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 538, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ve low metabolism and they were not able for power flight. Another cont...
^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... they were not able for power flight. Another controversial issue is the large...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 158, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...f the petraturea indicated that they had shallow bones. Their weight were too lig...
^^
Line 8, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...o stay a loft for any length of time. The final point of dispute is the ptreat...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 10, column 99, Rule ID: AGREEMENT_SENT_START[1]
Message: You should probably use 'assert'.
Suggestion: assert
... take off from the ground. The lectures asserts that they were different from the other...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, so, thus, in contrast, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 10.4613686534 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 5.04856512141 20% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 7.30242825607 55% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 12.0 12.0772626932 99% => OK
Pronoun: 33.0 22.412803532 147% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 34.0 30.3222958057 112% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 5.01324503311 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1333.0 1373.03311258 97% => OK
No of words: 275.0 270.72406181 102% => OK
Chars per words: 4.84727272727 5.08290768461 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07223819929 4.04702891845 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.22549019579 2.5805825403 86% => OK
Unique words: 135.0 145.348785872 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.490909090909 0.540411800872 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 386.1 419.366225166 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.55342163355 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 3.25607064018 61% => OK
Article: 6.0 8.23620309051 73% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 13.0662251656 107% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 21.2450331126 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.3698565511 49.2860985944 102% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.2142857143 110.228320801 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.6428571429 21.698381199 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.28571428571 7.06452816374 61% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 12.0 4.19205298013 286% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 4.33554083885 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 4.45695364238 135% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.27373068433 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.413296125393 0.272083759551 152% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.152059660232 0.0996497079465 153% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0770066603097 0.0662205650399 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.254401136957 0.162205337803 157% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0624572906569 0.0443174109184 141% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.2 13.3589403974 84% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 69.11 53.8541721854 128% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 11.0289183223 75% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.85 12.2367328918 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.11 8.42419426049 84% => OK
difficult_words: 44.0 63.6247240618 69% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.7273730684 103% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.498013245 91% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.2008830022 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.