TPO14 Writing
When it comes to the effects of salvage logging after fires and storms, the reading passage believe that it is beneficial to local forest and economy with three reasons, which are contradicted by the following lecture.
First, the reading passage reasons that cleaning up is necessary that can make space for new tree to grow. However, the lecture points that it is harmful to the damages forest in long-term. Because the dead trees can decompose, which can riches the soil for the future generation trees. On the contrary, quickly removing them can lead lacks of nutrition and reduce the growth speed of new trees.
Furthermore, the reading passage argues that the decaying trees can provide the habitat for a harmful insects called spruce bark beetle, which can damage the healthy trees. The lecture, on the other hand, points that the insects isn't harmful to forest. They can live in the trees for many years without any damage. What is more, decaying wood can be more good for some insects as well as birds. And salvage logging will lead some long-term harm to the forest .
Lastly, the reading passage mentions that salvage logging is more economical, since they can still provide some wood which can be used, and the work of removing wood also creates more jobs. But the lecture holds a different view that economical effect is too small, and can't last long. Salvage wood can only be recovered by some vehicles, which are expensive use and maintain. Additionally, the jobs are only temporary, and outsiders with relative experience are more likely to be employed than local workers.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 103, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'insect'?
Suggestion: insect
...s can provide the habitat for a harmful insects called spruce bark beetle, which can da...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 230, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: isn't
...the other hand, points that the insects isnt harmful to forest. They can live in the...
^^^^
Line 5, column 459, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...l lead some long-term harm to the forest . Lastly, the reading passage mention...
^^
Line 7, column 271, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
...hat economical effect is too small, and cant last long. Salvage wood can only be rec...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, however, if, lastly, so, still, well, as well as, on the contrary, what is more, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 10.4613686534 134% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 5.04856512141 238% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 9.0 7.30242825607 123% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 12.0772626932 116% => OK
Pronoun: 14.0 22.412803532 62% => OK
Preposition: 23.0 30.3222958057 76% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 5.01324503311 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1329.0 1373.03311258 97% => OK
No of words: 268.0 270.72406181 99% => OK
Chars per words: 4.95895522388 5.08290768461 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.04607285448 4.04702891845 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.34170647739 2.5805825403 91% => OK
Unique words: 146.0 145.348785872 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.544776119403 0.540411800872 101% => OK
syllable_count: 405.0 419.366225166 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 3.25607064018 31% => OK
Article: 7.0 8.23620309051 85% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.25165562914 240% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 5.0 1.51434878587 330% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 13.0662251656 107% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 21.2450331126 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.3933932665 49.2860985944 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.9285714286 110.228320801 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.1428571429 21.698381199 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.21428571429 7.06452816374 130% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 4.19205298013 95% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 4.33554083885 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.27373068433 94% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.458978644125 0.272083759551 169% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.156674876909 0.0996497079465 157% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0665939059273 0.0662205650399 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.273527178299 0.162205337803 169% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0743957359256 0.0443174109184 168% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.5 13.3589403974 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 53.8541721854 113% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.0289183223 86% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.49 12.2367328918 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.11 8.42419426049 96% => OK
difficult_words: 60.0 63.6247240618 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.7273730684 103% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.498013245 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.2008830022 89% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 20.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.