tpo16
Both author and lecturer offer two opposing views on the restriction about archaeology in the United Kingdom. While, the text lists some factors as the limitation of this job in the England, the professor counters these specific factors, and she mentions to the adaptation of new role in the England which overcomes all of these barriers.
First of all, the professor refutes that the construction of new buildings demolishes the valuable ancient artifacts, which in the reading part is named as one of the main element of limitation. The lecturer states that after the new role, each site before the construction is examined by the archeologist to assure it does not have valuable relics from the past. If there is any part of ancient artifacts, the archaeologists and construction team will consult about it; moreover, they will make a decision either they continue to build their building or excavate the site.
Next, the passage points to the lack of financial adherence from the government as one of the restrictions. The lecturer doubts on the truth of this claim. As she asserts, based on the novel role, the construction company which finds the site with the archeology value is oblige to pay whole initial costs. As a result, these companies can be considered as a new monetary source, which allows the archeologists' activities enhance far greater than the past.
Finally, meanwhile the passage presumes that there is a less opportunity to own this career in the England; the professor argues its accuracy. Based on the lecturer evidence, there is more demand for archeologist in the various steps such as the examination of the site, making a decision, and research. In addition, the new financial resource provides a decent support for them. Consequently, nowadays there is a great requirement for the archeologists.
That how, the professor effectively challenges the claims made in the article.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 273, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'obliged'.
Suggestion: obliged
...s the site with the archeology value is oblige to pay whole initial costs. As a result...
^^^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['consequently', 'finally', 'first', 'if', 'moreover', 'so', 'while', 'in addition', 'such as', 'as a result', 'first of all']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.264367816092 0.261695866417 101% => OK
Verbs: 0.112068965517 0.158904122519 71% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0718390804598 0.0723426182421 99% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0258620689655 0.0435111971325 59% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0258620689655 0.0277247811725 93% => OK
Prepositions: 0.135057471264 0.128828473217 105% => OK
Participles: 0.0229885057471 0.0370669169778 62% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.91036936412 2.5805825403 113% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0172413793103 0.0208969081088 83% => OK
Particles: 0.0 0.00154638098197 0% => OK
Determiners: 0.181034482759 0.128158765124 141% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.00862068965517 0.0158828679856 54% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0172413793103 0.0114777025283 150% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 1917.0 1645.83664459 116% => OK
No of words: 312.0 271.125827815 115% => OK
Chars per words: 6.14423076923 6.08160592843 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.20279927342 4.04852973271 104% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.355769230769 0.374372842146 95% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.291666666667 0.287516216867 101% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.233974358974 0.187439937562 125% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.147435897436 0.113142543107 130% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.91036936412 2.5805825403 113% => OK
Unique words: 177.0 145.348785872 122% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.567307692308 0.539623497131 105% => OK
Word variations: 61.0109601669 53.8517498576 113% => OK
How many sentences: 14.0 13.0529801325 107% => OK
Sentence length: 22.2857142857 21.7502111507 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.0092406269 49.3711431718 107% => OK
Chars per sentence: 136.928571429 132.220823453 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.2857142857 21.7502111507 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.785714285714 0.878197800319 89% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 3.39072847682 29% => OK
Readability: 51.4523809524 50.5018328374 102% => OK
Elegance: 2.57894736842 1.90840788429 135% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.619958977736 0.549887131256 113% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.140919714492 0.142949733639 99% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0841914954249 0.0787303798458 107% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.697286677995 0.631733273073 110% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.137066086239 0.139662658121 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.322591301303 0.266732575781 121% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.103523325308 0.103435571967 100% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.514276797765 0.414875509568 124% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0579815042882 0.0530846634433 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.454837007552 0.40443939384 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0831424360493 0.0528353158467 157% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 4.33554083885 185% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.26048565121 23% => More neutral sentences wanted.
Positive topic words: 6.0 3.49668874172 172% => OK
Negative topic words: 5.0 3.62251655629 138% => OK
Neutral topic words: 1.0 3.1766004415 31% => OK
Total topic words: 12.0 10.2958057395 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 86.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 26.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.