The passage discusses several serious problems in Britain Archeology field that were no problem in the past. The professor, on the other hand, believes, because of the new guideline in the archeology field enrolled by the government, that Britain is now having a bright period in the field.
Firstly, the author points in the passage out losing many valuable artifacts to construction projects, because of building new constructions. However, the professor states that new rules, thanks to the guideline, requires for new buildings' area to archeologic examination beforehand. If the sites do have valuable artifacts, people who live in the city permit for construction.
Secondly, the passage expresses the government's minimal financial support for archaeological research. The professor, on the contrary, explains the financial support from construction companies. According to the new guideline, companies pay the preservation investment, and thus, interesting projects are provided by this investment.
Thirdly, the author complains about the number of available jobs for archeology career, and claims that archeologists ended up pursuing other careers. Despite the lecturer proves, with the guideline, plenty of jobs are available, such as investigation of a construction site before the company starts to build or preserving and doing research on the site and processing the outputs. Therefore, a bright era is happening in the field of Britain's archeology, she believes.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 292, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ow having a bright period in the field. Firstly, the author points in the passag...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 231, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'buildings'' or 'building's'?
Suggestion: buildings'; building's
...anks to the guideline, requires for new buildings area to archeologic examination beforeh...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, however, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, third, thirdly, thus, such as, on the contrary, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 10.4613686534 48% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 5.04856512141 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 7.30242825607 68% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 12.0772626932 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 6.0 22.412803532 27% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 30.3222958057 102% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 5.01324503311 199% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1266.0 1373.03311258 92% => OK
No of words: 220.0 270.72406181 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.75454545455 5.08290768461 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.85128510684 4.04702891845 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.17246677753 2.5805825403 123% => OK
Unique words: 136.0 145.348785872 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.618181818182 0.540411800872 114% => OK
syllable_count: 378.0 419.366225166 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.55342163355 109% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 3.25607064018 61% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.25165562914 240% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 1.51434878587 132% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 2.5761589404 272% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 13.0662251656 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 21.2450331126 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.0129850057 49.2860985944 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.090909091 110.228320801 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0 21.698381199 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.5454545455 7.06452816374 163% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 4.33554083885 185% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 4.45695364238 45% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.27373068433 23% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.245870624913 0.272083759551 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0883121560292 0.0996497079465 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.040736379308 0.0662205650399 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.136962800357 0.162205337803 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0273266514392 0.0443174109184 62% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.7 13.3589403974 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 53.8541721854 79% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.0289183223 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.07 12.2367328918 131% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.08 8.42419426049 120% => OK
difficult_words: 76.0 63.6247240618 119% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.7273730684 103% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.498013245 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.2008830022 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 90.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 27.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.