TPO16Q1
The reading passage and lecture are both about The United kingdom known as britain has a tremendous amount of histories and cultural artefacts and they have may somewhat be lost during the industrial era. The author strongly postulates that most of revealing and investigating old remains confront with many obstacles and restrictions because of the development years. On the other hand, The listening adamantly delineates that the government legislated the new guideline in 3 areas which are mentioned in the passage because of several compelling reasons.
First and foremost, According to the author of the excerpt that in1950s the population amazingly increased so they had to start building project throughout valuable archaeological areas. Furthermore, while the builders were doing the construction of the base, they didn't retain the relics which were destroyed at that time. Nonetheless, The professor offsets these points by asserting that the government required the companies to examine whether there were any artefacts located before beginning the construction. If they found any archaeological interests or value they informed to government officials and building conductors to make a plan to preserve it.
On top of this, the professor in the lecture elaborates these points by bringing up that it was paid by constitution companies not government to made initial archaeological examination before using certain areas so it means they received enough fund from wealthy companies. these claims refute the author's implications about many experts couldn't be financially supported by the government because of their priorities lead to a decrease in the fund.
The text lastly insists that pursuing a career as archaeologists is a hardship because a few agencies and universities wanted to subsidise their researches, thus most of them prefer to work in other undesirable jobs. The speaker in lecture counters these indications by asserting that many experts carry out many stages of the process in researches and investigations so it was fairly possible that they paid well due to conducting many procedures so today they are highly respected by britain.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 265, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: didn't
...oing the construction of the base, they didnt retain the relics which were destroyed ...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 274, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: These
...ved enough fund from wealthy companies. these claims refute the authors implications ...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 338, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: couldn't
...authors implications about many experts couldnt be financially supported by the governm...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, furthermore, if, lastly, may, nonetheless, so, thus, well, while, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.4613686534 105% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 5.04856512141 20% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 7.30242825607 137% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 12.0772626932 91% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 22.412803532 129% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 46.0 30.3222958057 152% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 5.01324503311 219% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1835.0 1373.03311258 134% => OK
No of words: 334.0 270.72406181 123% => OK
Chars per words: 5.49401197605 5.08290768461 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.27500489853 4.04702891845 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.05596530551 2.5805825403 118% => OK
Unique words: 199.0 145.348785872 137% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.595808383234 0.540411800872 110% => OK
syllable_count: 567.0 419.366225166 135% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.55342163355 109% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 3.25607064018 61% => OK
Article: 7.0 8.23620309051 85% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 13.0662251656 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 30.0 21.2450331126 141% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 43.7396504878 49.2860985944 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 166.818181818 110.228320801 151% => OK
Words per sentence: 30.3636363636 21.698381199 140% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.18181818182 7.06452816374 116% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 4.19205298013 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 4.33554083885 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.27373068433 23% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.296173234644 0.272083759551 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0999045034918 0.0996497079465 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0277484784322 0.0662205650399 42% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.162469576967 0.162205337803 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.00640784490796 0.0443174109184 14% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 19.6 13.3589403974 147% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 32.57 53.8541721854 60% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 5.55761589404 202% => Smog_index is high.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 16.2 11.0289183223 147% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.15 12.2367328918 124% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.85 8.42419426049 117% => OK
difficult_words: 100.0 63.6247240618 157% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 10.7273730684 135% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.0 10.498013245 133% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.2008830022 134% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.