TPO23
The reading passage claims that an especial species of tree called yellow cedar are declining drastically in the northwestern United States for a century because of some hypotheses alleged by scientists. However, the lecturer finds all the ideas dubious and presents some evidence to refute them all.
First, the author contends that beetles are the main reasons of diminish of cedar population that attack this tree and eat the wood. Conversely, the lecturer brings up the idea that healthy trees are much more resistant to insect infestation owing to the fact that cedar trees contain an especial substance that poisons to insects. So, it is less likely that beetles be the main reason of cedar's decline.
Furthermore, the author holds the view that decrease of brown bears might the other reason of this decline because they use to eat tree bark with a high concentration of sugar. In contrast, the professor underlines the fact that bears damage some trees in mainland and island. In fact, there are some trees on the island that are damaged as well without the presence of brown bears.
Finally, as set forth by the author climate change may play a significant role in declining of cedar trees owing to the fact that temperature will affect root systems of yellow cedar. On the contrary, the speaker dismisses this issue due to the fact that majorities of trees are dying in low elevation. In fact, there are more trees in cold weather at high elevation.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 121, Rule ID: USE_TO_VERB[1]
Message: Did you mean 'used'?
Suggestion: used
...her reason of this decline because they use to eat tree bark with a high concentrat...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
conversely, finally, first, furthermore, however, if, may, so, well, in contrast, in fact, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.4613686534 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 5.04856512141 59% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 7.30242825607 41% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 12.0 12.0772626932 99% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 22.412803532 80% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 30.3222958057 115% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 5.01324503311 160% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1223.0 1373.03311258 89% => OK
No of words: 248.0 270.72406181 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.9314516129 5.08290768461 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.96837696647 4.04702891845 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.48148384979 2.5805825403 96% => OK
Unique words: 139.0 145.348785872 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.560483870968 0.540411800872 104% => OK
syllable_count: 373.5 419.366225166 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 3.25607064018 31% => OK
Article: 7.0 8.23620309051 85% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 2.5761589404 155% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 13.0662251656 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 21.2450331126 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.114189244 49.2860985944 98% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.181818182 110.228320801 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.5454545455 21.698381199 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.63636363636 7.06452816374 136% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 4.33554083885 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 4.45695364238 135% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.27373068433 70% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.376711675331 0.272083759551 138% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.142166621574 0.0996497079465 143% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.074424040182 0.0662205650399 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.214600689836 0.162205337803 132% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0639580038451 0.0443174109184 144% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 13.3589403974 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 53.8541721854 107% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.0289183223 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.61 12.2367328918 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.36 8.42419426049 99% => OK
difficult_words: 57.0 63.6247240618 90% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 10.7273730684 131% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.498013245 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.2008830022 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.