tpo31
the passage claims that this is the implausible idea that fine line patterns in adjacency in the skeletal bone of Sinosauropteryx are the indication of these animals have feathers. even though, the lecture by bringing some evidence to display objection with the reading and deduce there are strong pieces of evidence to call Sinosauropteryx feathered dinosaur.
First, The author argues that the fine line could be the presentation of dinosaur skin's which decomposed into fibers after an animal's death. on the contrary, the professor highlights the fact that these skin fossils do not see in the other dinosaur in the same site and these animals were buried beautifully in volcanic ash without skin decomposition into the fiber.
second, the reading holds that view that there are more likely these fine lines interpreted as another part of dinosaur for instance frills. In contrast, the lecture dismisses the point owing to the fact that feathers contain protein structure like betacarotene, in opposition to frills which are chemically different.
Finally, the passage assert that inorder to location of feathers in Sinosauropteryx, there is impossible to use these feather as tools for flight or thermoregulation in contrast to other animlas that have feathers. conversly, the speaker bring up the fact that some animlas have feathers in their tail which has distinct function. in dinosaur also, this feathers were colourful and used for display and attract male.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: The
the passage claims that this is the implaus...
^^^
Line 1, column 182, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Even
...ication of these animals have feathers. even though, the lecture by bringing some ev...
^^^^
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ll Sinosauropteryx feathered dinosaur. First, The author argues that the fine l...
^^^
Line 3, column 127, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'animals'' or 'animal's'?
Suggestion: animals'; animal's
...s which decomposed into fibers after an animals death. on the contrary, the professor h...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 142, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: On
...sed into fibers after an animals death. on the contrary, the professor highlights ...
^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Second
...t skin decomposition into the fiber. second, the reading holds that view that there...
^^^^^^
Line 7, column 216, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Conversly
...st to other animlas that have feathers. conversly, the speaker bring up the fact that som...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 332, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: In
...their tail which has distinct function. in dinosaur also, this feathers were colou...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, finally, first, if, second, so, as to, for instance, in contrast, in contrast to, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.4613686534 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 5.04856512141 20% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 7.30242825607 68% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 12.0772626932 108% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 22.412803532 80% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 30.3222958057 109% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 5.01324503311 219% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1244.0 1373.03311258 91% => OK
No of words: 232.0 270.72406181 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.36206896552 5.08290768461 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.90276135726 4.04702891845 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86901939605 2.5805825403 111% => OK
Unique words: 134.0 145.348785872 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.577586206897 0.540411800872 107% => OK
syllable_count: 391.5 419.366225166 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.55342163355 109% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 3.25607064018 31% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 2.5761589404 155% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 13.0662251656 69% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 21.2450331126 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.9676881182 49.2860985944 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 138.222222222 110.228320801 125% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.7777777778 21.698381199 119% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.4444444444 7.06452816374 162% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 8.0 4.19205298013 191% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 4.33554083885 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 4.45695364238 22% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.27373068433 47% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.410075073775 0.272083759551 151% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.156416704337 0.0996497079465 157% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0511358828599 0.0662205650399 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.229702827529 0.162205337803 142% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0423985044074 0.0443174109184 96% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.7 13.3589403974 125% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.64 53.8541721854 70% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.0289183223 129% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.1 12.2367328918 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.03 8.42419426049 107% => OK
difficult_words: 61.0 63.6247240618 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 10.7273730684 135% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.498013245 114% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.2008830022 134% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 25.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.