TPO31(integrated)
The professor makes a strong and convincing argument to cast doubt on the writer's claim which states the line which found in the sinosauropteryx's fossil in volcanic ash, are not sign of feather or they were not functional feather. The three reasons that the professor argues with come in following.
First, the article claims that the critics showed that these line formed after sinosaur's dead and they don't represent functional structures. In contrast, the professor refutes this idea by explaining that after decomposition of dinosaur their body preserved well in volcanic ash like other animal'a fossil in that place. he states that these well preserved fossil related to well functional feathers no frils.
Secondly, the article points out that if these were feather, scientist cann't tell with certainty which part of dinosaur body were. However, the professor argues this idea by explaining that the chemical structure of feather and frills are different and beta caroten in feather is a very good sign for them where the frills do not have beta caroten protein. he asserts certainly that these line are related to feathers.
Third and last, the article stated taht feathers have known function as thermoregulation or flying for birds and the place that they found in these fossils don't match with this application. Conversly, the porfessor adds some more applicatioin such as display in mating for some feathers and said an example of this usage by calling Picac bird which has some orange and white feather. he inferes that these line can be related to some displaing feathers which sinosauropteryx used for mating.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 104, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...ne formed after sinosaurs dead and they dont represent functional structures. In con...
^^^^
Line 3, column 321, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: He
...ike other animala fossil in that place. he states that these well preserved fossil...
^^
Line 3, column 391, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'feathers'' or 'feather's'?
Suggestion: feathers'; feather's
...erved fossil related to well functional feathers no frils. Secondly, the article point...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 53, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'feathered'.
Suggestion: feathered
...e article points out that if these were feather, scientist cannt tell with certainty wh...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 358, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: He
...rills do not have beta caroten protein. he asserts certainly that these line are r...
^^
Line 7, column 157, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
... place that they found in these fossils dont match with this application. Conversly,...
^^^^
Line 7, column 385, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: He
...hich has some orange and white feather. he inferes that these line can be related ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, second, secondly, so, third, well, in contrast, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 10.4613686534 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 5.04856512141 20% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 7.30242825607 137% => OK
Relative clauses : 17.0 12.0772626932 141% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 22.412803532 129% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 29.0 30.3222958057 96% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.01324503311 100% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1364.0 1373.03311258 99% => OK
No of words: 264.0 270.72406181 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.16666666667 5.08290768461 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03089032464 4.04702891845 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.6417107695 2.5805825403 102% => OK
Unique words: 145.0 145.348785872 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.549242424242 0.540411800872 102% => OK
syllable_count: 409.5 419.366225166 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 3.25607064018 92% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 13.0662251656 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 21.2450331126 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 58.0138199551 49.2860985944 118% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.0 110.228320801 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.0 21.698381199 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.81818181818 7.06452816374 97% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 4.19205298013 167% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 4.33554083885 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 4.45695364238 45% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.27373068433 70% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.322571149465 0.272083759551 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.121831172298 0.0996497079465 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0455138377217 0.0662205650399 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.197094648745 0.162205337803 122% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0298932132562 0.0443174109184 67% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.9 13.3589403974 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 53.8541721854 87% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.0289183223 115% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.0 12.2367328918 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.36 8.42419426049 99% => OK
difficult_words: 59.0 63.6247240618 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 10.7273730684 126% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.498013245 110% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.2008830022 116% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 81.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.