Tpo39- Integrated writing
The reading passage asserts that there are three explanations for mass extinction at the end of the Triassic period which dated 200 million years ago. The lecturer, however, finds all of these explanations dubious and casts doubt on the reasons proposed by the reading passage.
First of all, the author of the reading argues that in that period of time, the sea levels reduces significantly; as a consequence, habitat of many of shallow-ocean and coastal spicies destroyed which leaded to destruction of food chain. Conversely, the lecturer underlines the issue that these species could adapt themselves to the gradually changes. Since the decline of sea levels took several million years, this cold not be an explanation for mass extinction.
Furthermore, the writer holds the view that due to the volcanic activity during this time, it caused spread of lots of sulfur dioxide in the atmosphere; as a result, these gases block the sunlight and ended up to the cooling of temperature. In contrast, the professor dismisses this issue due to the fact that these gas can combine to the water molecules, and in this way clean out from the atmosphere. Besides, it is less likely that lots of volcanic eruption took place on that time.
Finally, the reading passage mentioned that an asteroid probably collided with earth, and cause the elimination of lots of plants, and consequently lots of animals. On the contrast, the speaker challenged this argument and says that researcher did not found any asteroid crater in this period of time. Also, she continues that, investigators found a crater which dated 12000000 years before the mass extinction that is unlikely to lead to this phenomenon.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 61, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
...thor of the reading argues that in that period of time, the sea levels reduces significantly; ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 287, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
...d not found any asteroid crater in this period of time. Also, she continues that, investigator...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, consequently, conversely, finally, first, furthermore, however, if, so, in contrast, as a result, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 10.4613686534 38% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 5.04856512141 40% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 7.30242825607 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 12.0772626932 124% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 22.412803532 120% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 42.0 30.3222958057 139% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 5.01324503311 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1420.0 1373.03311258 103% => OK
No of words: 277.0 270.72406181 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.12635379061 5.08290768461 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07962216107 4.04702891845 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76719452392 2.5805825403 107% => OK
Unique words: 158.0 145.348785872 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.570397111913 0.540411800872 106% => OK
syllable_count: 424.8 419.366225166 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 3.25607064018 154% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.25165562914 240% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 1.51434878587 198% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 13.0662251656 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 21.2450331126 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.8572652401 49.2860985944 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 129.090909091 110.228320801 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.1818181818 21.698381199 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.3636363636 7.06452816374 161% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 4.33554083885 23% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.27373068433 140% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0 0.272083759551 0% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0 0.0996497079465 0% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0662205650399 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0 0.162205337803 0% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0443174109184 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.3 13.3589403974 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.56 53.8541721854 101% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.0289183223 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.77 12.2367328918 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.15 8.42419426049 109% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 63.6247240618 118% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 10.7273730684 131% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.498013245 114% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.2008830022 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.