TPO40
The reading passage explores the issue of maintaining a human presence there would be impossible, and several reasons are offered in support of this argument. However, the lecturer casts doubt on it and offers several reasons to oppose it.
First of all, even though the reading passage suggest that atmospheric pressure is too high for human, the lecturer argues that we can go to the higher level. That is because that 15 kilograms high will be same as earth atmospheric pressure, which means human can live on Venus. Obviously, the lecturer's argument disproves its counterpart in the reading.
Second, the speaker refutes the reading by mentioning no water and oxygen. Though the article states that the purpose of establishing a permanent station can not be come true, he says that using the carbon dioxide, nitrogen, and sulfuric acid to combine. Therefore, the lecturer concludes that it can make water and oxygen.
The last reason is that few sunlight can not get electricity. The lecturer convincingly points out that the Venus sunlight can use to power machines and equipment; moreover, in order to establish a solid and concrete statement, he offers the example that the the solar plant can use little sunlight to power the machines and equipment.
In conclusion, based on the evidence presented above, it can be clearly seen that the stances on both sides are paradoxical. Although the contents in the reading passage seem to be plausible, further scrutiny leads the lecturer to believe that the points of view are not correct.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 294, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'lecturers'' or 'lecturer's'?
Suggestion: lecturers'; lecturer's
...human can live on Venus. Obviously, the lecturers argument disproves its counterpart in t...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 25, Rule ID: MANY_NN_U[6]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun sunlight seems to be uncountable; consider using: 'little sunlight'.
Suggestion: little sunlight
...er and oxygen. The last reason is that few sunlight can not get electricity. The lecturer c...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 255, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: the
...e statement, he offers the example that the the solar plant can use little sunlight to ...
^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 255, Rule ID: DT_DT[1]
Message: Maybe you need to remove one determiner so that only 'the' or 'the' is left.
Suggestion: the; the
...e statement, he offers the example that the the solar plant can use little sunlight to ...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, moreover, second, so, therefore, in conclusion, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.4613686534 105% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 5.04856512141 198% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 7.30242825607 110% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 12.0772626932 108% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 22.412803532 94% => OK
Preposition: 25.0 30.3222958057 82% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 5.01324503311 160% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1289.0 1373.03311258 94% => OK
No of words: 254.0 270.72406181 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.07480314961 5.08290768461 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.99216450694 4.04702891845 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.65801686039 2.5805825403 103% => OK
Unique words: 146.0 145.348785872 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.574803149606 0.540411800872 106% => OK
syllable_count: 401.4 419.366225166 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 3.25607064018 123% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.25165562914 240% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 1.51434878587 132% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 13.0662251656 92% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 21.2450331126 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 59.3737572969 49.2860985944 120% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.416666667 110.228320801 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.1666666667 21.698381199 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.33333333333 7.06452816374 90% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 4.19205298013 95% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 4.33554083885 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 4.45695364238 135% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.27373068433 70% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.247852307069 0.272083759551 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0832424245697 0.0996497079465 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.059423702851 0.0662205650399 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.124640265548 0.162205337803 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0447122465422 0.0443174109184 101% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 13.3589403974 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 53.8541721854 93% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.0289183223 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.13 12.2367328918 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.34 8.42419426049 111% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 63.6247240618 118% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.7273730684 98% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.498013245 99% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.2008830022 116% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.