TPO40-W1
In the reading passage, the author mentions three possible reasons proving that it is impossible to keep a human habitat on Venus. The conclusion seems plausible at first glance but is actually contradicted by the following lecture. The lecturer points out a solution of establishing the habitat 50 kilometers above the surface of the Venus, which doesn't exist those three relative issues.
In the first place, the writer worries about the extremely high atmospheric pressure at Venus' surface, which could crush almost anything artificial. However, the speaking material contends that the atmospheric pressure will decrease as the elevation rises and hence, by means of the solution, people on the habitat will be around with the similar pressure as on the earth’s surface.
On top of that, the reading material states that there is no available water or oxygen on the surface or in the atmosphere of Venus to sustain the residence. By contrast, this barrier could also be eliminated when at 50 kilometers above the surface, as the speaker says. The human can acquire water and oxygen from the carbon dioxide and sulfuric acid in the atmosphere by chemical reaction at the station. There is no requirement to import these essential materials from earth.
At last, the author contends that scarce sunlight could reach the surface and utilized by people to require electricity. But the lecturer's proposition could address this problem. Because the clouds above the station will be not so thick that the station could receive ample sunlight to generate electricity. At the same time, we could exploit the reflected sunlight from clouds below as well.
All in all, if the author couldn't provide evidences to challenge the suggestion, the argument will be definitely flawed.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 349, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
...s above the surface of the Venus, which doesnt exist those three relative issues. In ...
^^^^^^
Line 4, column 179, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Because” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...proposition could address this problem. Because the clouds above the station will be no...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 27, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: couldn't
...low as well. All in all, if the author couldnt provide evidences to challenge the sugg...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, first, hence, however, if, so, well, in the first place, on top of that
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 10.4613686534 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 5.04856512141 218% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 8.0 7.30242825607 110% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 12.0772626932 75% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 12.0 22.412803532 54% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 30.3222958057 135% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 5.01324503311 239% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1493.0 1373.03311258 109% => OK
No of words: 286.0 270.72406181 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.22027972028 5.08290768461 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11236361783 4.04702891845 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.68147170016 2.5805825403 104% => OK
Unique words: 159.0 145.348785872 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.555944055944 0.540411800872 103% => OK
syllable_count: 467.1 419.366225166 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 3.25607064018 61% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.25165562914 240% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 2.5761589404 272% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 13.0662251656 107% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 21.2450331126 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.6191606809 49.2860985944 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.642857143 110.228320801 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.4285714286 21.698381199 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.57142857143 7.06452816374 93% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 4.19205298013 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 4.45695364238 157% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.27373068433 70% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.333574464447 0.272083759551 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.105300230397 0.0996497079465 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0582091263824 0.0662205650399 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.159377941478 0.162205337803 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0754823301739 0.0443174109184 170% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 13.3589403974 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 53.8541721854 95% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.0289183223 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.0 12.2367328918 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.93 8.42419426049 106% => OK
difficult_words: 78.0 63.6247240618 123% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 10.7273730684 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.498013245 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.