tpo41
Both reading and the lecture discuss about whether stricter regulation law must be created or not. The author mentions that new regulations are not necessary and lead to negative results. By contrast, the lecturer believes the opposite view.
First, the reading passage says that, there are effective environmental regulations such as using liner-special material which prevents coal ash from leaking into the soil and contaminating the drinking water. However, the lecturer mentions that, this method is not sufficient because companies are not required to build a new land field for a new liner. Therefore using the old one leads to produce harmful materials which contaminates drinking water.
Second, the reading passage claims that, if new stricter laws are adopted, companies might discourage the recycling of coal ash into other products such as, concrete and bricks because consumers might think that coal ash are is too harmful and refuse to buy these products. On the other hand, the speaker says that, adopting new rules do not mean stop recycling products. companies can safetly for over 50 years recylce recycle coal ash and produce material sush as mercury that are not harmful.mercury and it receives little concerns.
Third, the writer believes that adopting new rules will increase the cost for power companies and then will increase the electricity price. The speaker, on the other hand, mentions that this process will increase the price of electricity by just 1 percent, which is not a serious severe problem.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 355, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Therefore,
...build a new land field for a new liner. Therefore using the old one leads to produce harm...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 372, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Companies
...es do not mean stop recycling products. companies can safetly for over 50 years recylce r...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, second, so, then, therefore, third, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.4613686534 96% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 5.04856512141 139% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 7.30242825607 123% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 12.0772626932 99% => OK
Pronoun: 13.0 22.412803532 58% => OK
Preposition: 16.0 30.3222958057 53% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 1.0 5.01324503311 20% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1289.0 1373.03311258 94% => OK
No of words: 244.0 270.72406181 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.28278688525 5.08290768461 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.95227774224 4.04702891845 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.63701085633 2.5805825403 102% => OK
Unique words: 140.0 145.348785872 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.573770491803 0.540411800872 106% => OK
syllable_count: 388.8 419.366225166 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 3.25607064018 31% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 13.0662251656 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 21.2450331126 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 59.4701119461 49.2860985944 121% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.181818182 110.228320801 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.1818181818 21.698381199 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.45454545455 7.06452816374 106% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 4.45695364238 45% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.27373068433 94% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.4409305505 0.272083759551 162% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.141985605229 0.0996497079465 142% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0979528889228 0.0662205650399 148% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.228064657589 0.162205337803 141% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.108022481142 0.0443174109184 244% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 13.3589403974 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 53.8541721854 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.0289183223 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.34 12.2367328918 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.74 8.42419426049 104% => OK
difficult_words: 62.0 63.6247240618 97% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.7273730684 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.498013245 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 83.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 25.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.