It goes without saying in this progressive and sophisticated world where we live, human being has been engaged in various activities and tasks in order to provide the necessities of life. Recently, there has been a hot debate among many people about the very notion that whether accomplishing similar tasks during the workday is more satisfactory for the workers or different types of task in a single working day might be more efficacious for them. As far as I am concerned, I hold the view that working similar errands and tasks can better satisfy workers. The reasons to substantiate my viewpoint are elaborated upon hereunder.
To begin with, it is no secret to anyone that being engaged in similar tasks will open the doors of expertise to the workers. In other words, when workers in any job and occupation, being a constructional worker, an employee working in an enterprise, a chief, or an assortment of other careers, work an elongated hours during various workdays on a specified task, it will improve his or her experience to a great extent. An example can drive this notion home. For more than five years, i have been working as the chief of a fast food restaurant in which the only served food is a special type of hamburger with a unique, personal recipe of mine. For five years, i have been preparing this special sandwich which put me in a prestigious place and rank among all other fast food centers in my city. In my opinion, the only reason that has led to my success and reputation lies behind the fact that i have gained noticeable experience not only about the food i make, but also about the costumers, their tastes and their desires. If i have been doing different activities-making various food to be served in the restaurant, i would not become as successful as i am presently.
Moreover, doing the same activities rather than different types of tasks will have a positive effect on the outcome of the job the workers do. Put it in other words, the more similar task the workers accomplish, the more productive the tasks and the more proficient the workers will be. In this line of thought, not only will the workers benefit from doing similar activities, but also the company they work for will become prosperous. As a result, since doing similar activities and tasks will shed light on the abilities and talents of the worker, they will in turn become more adept and proficient and less amount of time will be spend in order to do the job. As an illustration, my sister works as a translator in a company and from the first day of her job, he assured the manager to be the Persian to English translator not vice versa. Having focused on one task instead of engaging in two or three different ones related to translating, she has mastered her translation ability and she therefore is proficient enough to accomplish a simple task in a limited time. However, her other co-workers who have been struggling and delving themselves into various types of translation, cannot be as productive as my sister is for the company.
In conclusion, having considered the aforementioned reasons and examples into account, I do believe that working similar tasks during workday is more beneficial and satisfactory for the workers. Not only will they become expert and gain enough experience in their responsibilities, but also they become proficient and productive for the company they work for.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 956, Rule ID: I_LOWERCASE[2]
Message: Did you mean 'I'?
Suggestion: I
...able experience not only about the food i make, but also about the costumers, the...
^
Line 2, column 1120, Rule ID: I_LOWERCASE[2]
Message: Did you mean 'I'?
Suggestion: I
...us food to be served in the restaurant, i would not become as successful as i am ...
^
Line 2, column 1156, Rule ID: I_LOWERCASE[2]
Message: Did you mean 'I'?
Suggestion: I
...nt, i would not become as successful as i am presently. Moreover, doing the same...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, moreover, so, therefore, in conclusion, as a result, in my opinion, in other words, to begin with, to a great extent
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 22.0 10.4613686534 210% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 5.04856512141 297% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 26.0 7.30242825607 356% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 11.0 12.0772626932 91% => OK
Pronoun: 51.0 22.412803532 228% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 72.0 30.3222958057 237% => Less preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 9.0 5.01324503311 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2825.0 1373.03311258 206% => Less number of characters wanted.
No of words: 587.0 270.72406181 217% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.81260647359 5.08290768461 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.9222030514 4.04702891845 122% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80006065483 2.5805825403 109% => OK
Unique words: 262.0 145.348785872 180% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.446337308348 0.540411800872 83% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 895.5 419.366225166 214% => syllable counts are too long.
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 14.0 3.25607064018 430% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 7.0 8.23620309051 85% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 1.25165562914 479% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 4.0 1.51434878587 264% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 2.5761589404 233% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 13.0662251656 153% => OK
Sentence length: 29.0 21.2450331126 137% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 59.5042855599 49.2860985944 121% => OK
Chars per sentence: 141.25 110.228320801 128% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.35 21.698381199 135% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.35 7.06452816374 104% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 4.19205298013 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 16.0 4.33554083885 369% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 4.45695364238 45% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.27373068433 47% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.114361754918 0.272083759551 42% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0435378159597 0.0996497079465 44% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0239116684932 0.0662205650399 36% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0796730508454 0.162205337803 49% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0176555795749 0.0443174109184 40% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.9 13.3589403974 119% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.5 53.8541721854 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.0289183223 121% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.21 12.2367328918 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.03 8.42419426049 95% => OK
difficult_words: 110.0 63.6247240618 173% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 10.7273730684 131% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.6 10.498013245 130% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.2008830022 125% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.