TPO46
The reading and the talk both discuss electronic medical record system. The passage claims that electronic system has several benefits. The lecture, in contrast, not only refutes the author's assessments but also asserts that the announced claims run counter to the statements of the reading. The professor puts forth three conspicuous reasons to categorically rejects whatever mentioned in the passage.
The first allegation of the reading against which the speaker argues is that it can reduce costs such as faxing, copying, and transportation of paper. Nevertheless, the lecturer highlights the fact that it is of great significance costs. he further illustrates that doctors have to use paper and keep these emergency backups. Thus, this point proves the main idea of the reading wrong.
Second, according to the reading, it can decrease the possibility of human errors; however, the professor finds this debatable. He gives support to his opinion by stating that most doctors still use pen and paper. Also, he mentions that doctors have to take notes by hand and later other people who are responsible should transfer these notes to electronic format. As a result, they may have a wrong interpretation of what the doctors have written.
Finally, the speaker flatly contradicts the mistaken belief of the reading that researchers can use this database in order to medical research. The lecturer, on the other hand, mentions that access to this information is impossible for researchers because keeping patient's private information is a law in the US. Accordingly, they have to get permission from patients, whereas cannot be guaranteed because sometimes patients block access to their information.
All in all, the points made by the professor in the lecture cast doubts on the reading. Lack of evidence in the claims of the reading, really call into question the validity of this passage. It is utmost importance in consumption of information to not take all at face value.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 137, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...electronic system has several benefits. The lecture, in contrast, not only refutes ...
^^^
Line 1, column 293, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...unter to the statements of the reading. The professor puts forth three conspicuous ...
^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...s whatever mentioned in the passage. The first allegation of the reading against...
^^^
Line 3, column 239, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: He
...that it is of great significance costs. he further illustrates that doctors have t...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, but, finally, first, however, if, may, nevertheless, really, second, so, still, thus, whereas, in contrast, such as, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 10.4613686534 67% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 5.04856512141 119% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 7.30242825607 82% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 12.0772626932 91% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 22.412803532 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 41.0 30.3222958057 135% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 5.01324503311 239% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1675.0 1373.03311258 122% => OK
No of words: 317.0 270.72406181 117% => OK
Chars per words: 5.28391167192 5.08290768461 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.21953715646 4.04702891845 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83602706052 2.5805825403 110% => OK
Unique words: 184.0 145.348785872 127% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.580441640379 0.540411800872 107% => OK
syllable_count: 504.0 419.366225166 120% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 3.25607064018 246% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 10.0 8.23620309051 121% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 13.0662251656 138% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 21.2450331126 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 34.3915364265 49.2860985944 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 93.0555555556 110.228320801 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.6111111111 21.698381199 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.22222222222 7.06452816374 131% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 4.19205298013 95% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 4.33554083885 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 10.0 4.45695364238 224% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.27373068433 47% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.275576581207 0.272083759551 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0706380281995 0.0996497079465 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0735587955073 0.0662205650399 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.122558918258 0.162205337803 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0591441372269 0.0443174109184 133% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 13.3589403974 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 53.8541721854 101% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.0289183223 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.05 12.2367328918 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.91 8.42419426049 106% => OK
difficult_words: 89.0 63.6247240618 140% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.7273730684 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.498013245 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 81.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.