tpo51

Essay topics:

tpo51

The reading claims that surprising elephent behaviors. The author elaborates his viewpoints by providing three main reasons. Nevertheless, the professor believes while elephents are fasinating animals, but their behaviors misunderstand by scientist and refutes each of the author's concepts.

First, the reading avers that elephents are aware of their death approaching since they breaking away from herds. However, the professor refutes this concept by stating that not all of elephents do that and it has practical reason. The more elephents old, the more their teeth disteroyed; hence, they must search for soft vegetation foods which required less chaoing. Thus, old elephents find these foods next to water sources and finally died there.

Furthermore, the article posits that elephents have artistic ability and by holding brush in their trunk draw flowers painting on canvas. On the other hand, the lecturer brings up the fact that it kind of human trick as they touched elephent ears at some directions taught them to painting like flowers or stright lines. After a while, elephents know that if they paint some lines they will encourage; so, learnt it by human help and it is not instinctive ability.

Finally, the article asserts that elephents afraid of mice instead of lions or tigers and made experience which proved that. Contrary, the lecturer casts doubt on this claim by stating that they only fear from mice becuase they are unfamillar with these small mammals. In addition, she states that only natural elephents feared from mice and zoo's animals did not treat as natural ones. In fact, after first time they fear from mice the know and did not fear anymore later.

Votes
Average: 0.3 (1 vote)
Essay Categories

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 434, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...t, after first time they fear from mice the know and did not fear anymore later.
^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, furthermore, hence, however, if, nevertheless, so, thus, while, in addition, in fact, kind of, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 10.4613686534 38% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 5.04856512141 40% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 7.30242825607 151% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 12.0772626932 108% => OK
Pronoun: 34.0 22.412803532 152% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 31.0 30.3222958057 102% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 5.01324503311 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1416.0 1373.03311258 103% => OK
No of words: 273.0 270.72406181 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.18681318681 5.08290768461 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.06481385082 4.04702891845 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.44465362801 2.5805825403 95% => OK
Unique words: 171.0 145.348785872 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.626373626374 0.540411800872 116% => OK
syllable_count: 414.9 419.366225166 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 3.25607064018 61% => OK
Article: 11.0 8.23620309051 134% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 2.5761589404 194% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 13.0662251656 107% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 21.2450331126 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.9223628721 49.2860985944 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.142857143 110.228320801 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.5 21.698381199 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.5 7.06452816374 134% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 4.45695364238 135% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.27373068433 94% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0 0.272083759551 0% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0 0.0996497079465 0% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0662205650399 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0 0.162205337803 0% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0443174109184 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 13.3589403974 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 53.8541721854 113% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.0289183223 86% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.82 12.2367328918 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.51 8.42419426049 101% => OK
difficult_words: 68.0 63.6247240618 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.7273730684 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.498013245 91% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.2008830022 116% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.

Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.