TPO52
The professor revises the idea presented in the passage that proposes three possible advantages of establishing human colonies on asteroids rather than Moon or Mars and refutes each of the points made in the passage.
First of all, the reading passage states that the low gravity of asteroids have several benefits including the easier landing and taking off of a spaceship and the higher capacity it could have. On the other hand, the professor argues against this idea by pointing out that there are certain risks accompanying the lower gravity. For instance, it can result in lower muscle mass and bone density. According to the professor, low gravity causes health problems even to the astronauts in short periods, yet alone lifetime travel to the asteroids. Therefore, the first view is not a practical idea.
Secondly, the professor's opinion contradicts the second notion mentioned in the text that mining and trading of valuable metals entailing gold and platinum, which are rare on Earth, could be advantageous for businesses. He believes that the costs of mining and transporting these metals in large quantities could be extremely high. Besides, the rarity of these metals is the key factor for their value. If they are abundant, they will lose their current market price. Hence, the second reason does not seem to be a profitable idea for the purpose of the text.
Finally, the author proposes that asteroids are easy to reach since they move and sometimes get exceptionally close to Earth. On the contrary, the professor holds a different view. He clarifies that although it is easy to reach the asteroids, it is not easy to return from them since they have unusual orbits. As a result, they may approach Earth's orbit in one point, but they can travel much farther even than the location of Mars. Thus, the third reason has serious deficiencies regarding the main point of the passage.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 15, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'professors'' or 'professor's'?
Suggestion: professors'; professor's
...s not a practical idea. Secondly, the professors opinion contradicts the second notion m...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 11, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ing the main point of the passage.
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, finally, first, hence, if, may, regarding, second, secondly, so, therefore, third, thus, for instance, in short, as a result, first of all, on the contrary, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.4613686534 105% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 5.04856512141 139% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 7.30242825607 151% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 12.0772626932 66% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 25.0 22.412803532 112% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 30.3222958057 125% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 5.01324503311 40% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1608.0 1373.03311258 117% => OK
No of words: 319.0 270.72406181 118% => OK
Chars per words: 5.0407523511 5.08290768461 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.22617688928 4.04702891845 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.56246152332 2.5805825403 99% => OK
Unique words: 190.0 145.348785872 131% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.595611285266 0.540411800872 110% => OK
syllable_count: 489.6 419.366225166 117% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 3.25607064018 184% => OK
Article: 10.0 8.23620309051 121% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.51434878587 132% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 13.0662251656 122% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 21.2450331126 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 57.4065812511 49.2860985944 116% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.5 110.228320801 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.9375 21.698381199 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.75 7.06452816374 166% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 4.33554083885 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.27373068433 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0 0.272083759551 0% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0 0.0996497079465 0% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0662205650399 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0 0.162205337803 0% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0443174109184 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 13.3589403974 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 53.8541721854 113% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.0289183223 86% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.95 12.2367328918 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.59 8.42419426049 102% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 63.6247240618 127% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 10.7273730684 126% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.498013245 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.2008830022 89% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.