tpo52
asteroids are some large space objects
The article states that some think that asteroids, which are some space objects, are favorable places to live and provides three reasons of support. However, the professor finds all the ideas dubious and unconvincing and presents some counter evidence to refute them all.
First, the reading states that asteroids have low gravity. Hence, they are appropriated places for setting up a colony. In contrast the lecturer refutes this point by stating that low gravity presents some risks, such as losing muscle mass, bone density and so on. For instance, astronomers who have traveled with spacecrafts, suffer from low bone density and lost muscle mass. Therefore, living for a long time in such places would have unfavorable effects on their residents.
Second, the article avers that there are some valuable metals in asteroids, which is very beneficial. Conversely, the professor explains that other factors, such as cost should be considered. For example, supporting the colony, or transporting those metals are costly, and will reduce the profits. Furthermore, the price of those metals might not stay the same. Hence, this assertion is not lucrative.
Third, the reading claims that asteroids are easy to reach. On the contrary, the lecturer opposes this point by saying that asteroids' orbits are not unusual. Actually, they get close to the Earth, and then, move away; therefore, it may seem that it is easy to reach them but it does not mean that coming back from them is easy too. Consequently, this claim is incorrect.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 123, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[2]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: contrast,
...ated places for setting up a colony. In contrast the lecturer refutes this point by stat...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, but, consequently, conversely, first, furthermore, hence, however, may, second, so, then, therefore, third, for example, for instance, in contrast, such as, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 10.4613686534 124% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 5.04856512141 99% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 7.30242825607 123% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 12.0772626932 108% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 22.412803532 112% => OK
Preposition: 19.0 30.3222958057 63% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 5.01324503311 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1283.0 1373.03311258 93% => OK
No of words: 248.0 270.72406181 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.17338709677 5.08290768461 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.96837696647 4.04702891845 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.56375204178 2.5805825403 99% => OK
Unique words: 150.0 145.348785872 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.604838709677 0.540411800872 112% => OK
syllable_count: 389.7 419.366225166 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 3.25607064018 154% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 1.51434878587 198% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 13.0662251656 122% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 21.2450331126 71% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 38.5619935137 49.2860985944 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 80.1875 110.228320801 73% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.5 21.698381199 71% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.375 7.06452816374 161% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.27373068433 164% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0862404369997 0.272083759551 32% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0241081859892 0.0996497079465 24% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0502719802454 0.0662205650399 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0585590416633 0.162205337803 36% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0688174777268 0.0443174109184 155% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.7 13.3589403974 80% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 56.25 53.8541721854 104% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.0289183223 83% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.41 12.2367328918 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.46 8.42419426049 100% => OK
difficult_words: 64.0 63.6247240618 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.7273730684 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.498013245 76% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.2008830022 71% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.