TPO42
Workers are more satisfied when they have many different types of tasks to do during the workday than when do similar tasks all day long.
A large number of people spend most of their time at their work; therefore, it has an undeniable role in the individuals’ lives. Although a plethora of people hold the opinion that doing sundry tasks is more satisfying for workers, others disagree with this point of view and believe that doing identical duties during a day is better. I, to a great extent, hold this viewpoint that it is more useful for employees to accomplish similar types of activities during the workday. Among countless reasons, which can vindicate my point of view, I will mention the two most conspicuous ones through the following paragraphs.
The first reason that juts out of my mind easily at the first moment of thinking about this issue is the fact that by doing just one activity during the day, employees will have better performance. This matter is thanks to the fact that these workers concentrate on a task, which has be repeated all day. Therefore, they accomplish their jobs with beneficial results since they are familiar with all aspects of their duty. To cast more light on this matter, consider a man who a variety of activities in his job. Definitely, he cannot concentrate on a particular task and has to do some duties together; therefore, after a while, he will become disappointed sine he is not able to cope with these different tasks and as a result, his performance will reduce. As it is clear, the less various tasks someone does, the more lucrative its outcome will be.
The second and equally exquisite proof for this assertion is about this importance that people who do analogous duties will make less mistakes than the others. This claim is owing to the fact that these human beings accomplish one task again and again(successively). Hence, it is unlikely that they do their jobs wrong and make mistakes, which means that they will become more professional in their work. To give a tangible example, a research that has been conducted by some scientists in my country has shown that individuals who do sundry tasks in their jobs, will commit at least three mistakes per a workday. In other words, their jobs do not have a profitable result. Therefore, scientists highly recommend employees to do only one task during a workday.
To make a long story short, based on the aforementioned arguments, we may draw the conclusion that it can be more advantageous for workers to not accomplish different activities at work. This contention is due to this importance that when they concentrate on one job, not only will they gain excellent results but also they will become more knowledgeable experts in their job.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: Many; Numerous
A large number of people spend most of their time at thei...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 284, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Use past participle here: 'been'.
Suggestion: been
...orkers concentrate on a task, which has be repeated all day. Therefore, they accom...
^^
Line 3, column 130, Rule ID: FEWER_LESS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'fewer'? The noun mistakes is countable.
Suggestion: fewer
...eople who do analogous duties will make less mistakes than the others. This claim is...
^^^^
Line 3, column 431, Rule ID: A_UNCOUNTABLE[1]
Message: Uncountable nouns are usually not used with an indefinite article. Use simply 'research'.
Suggestion: research
...their work. To give a tangible example, a research that has been conducted by some scienti...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, hence, if, may, second, so, therefore, while, as to, at least, as a result, in other words, to a great extent
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 15.1003584229 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 9.8082437276 143% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 13.8261648746 51% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 21.0 11.0286738351 190% => OK
Pronoun: 59.0 43.0788530466 137% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 55.0 52.1666666667 105% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.0752688172 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2174.0 1977.66487455 110% => OK
No of words: 446.0 407.700716846 109% => OK
Chars per words: 4.87443946188 4.8611393121 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.5955099915 4.48103885553 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76136710776 2.67179642975 103% => OK
Unique words: 221.0 212.727598566 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.495515695067 0.524837075471 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 666.0 618.680645161 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 12.0 9.59856630824 125% => OK
Article: 6.0 3.08781362007 194% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6003584229 87% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.1344086022 119% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.1385734062 48.9658058833 102% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.777777778 100.406767564 120% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.7777777778 20.6045352989 120% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.05555555556 5.45110844103 129% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.5376344086 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 11.8709677419 110% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.85842293907 130% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.88709677419 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.306335373827 0.236089414692 130% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0983642717919 0.076458572812 129% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0598782965533 0.0737576698707 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.18675163658 0.150856017488 124% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0366169622698 0.0645574589148 57% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 11.7677419355 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 58.1214874552 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.1575268817 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.26 10.9000537634 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.05 8.01818996416 100% => OK
difficult_words: 91.0 86.8835125448 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 10.002688172 135% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.0537634409 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.