TPO42
Workers are more satisfied when they have many different types of tasks to do during the workday than when do similar tasks all day long.
this topic has always been a controvesial subject among people with different points of view. Some people are strongly convinced doing types of tasks better than similar tasks, but other bilieve similar tastks is a better one because in this situation they do not have stress. I firmly assert the first point carries high weigh, and I use following reasons to support my position.
first, I think for starting work doing simiar tasks may seems enjoyment, but after a while it becomes borring. if at first you have incentive for doing tasks, by repeat and doing similar tasks you will lose your motivation gradually. when I started my job in my brother's office, at first it was exciting to me because my tasks were similar to previose one, and I finished my deem very soon, and I had fredom, but after a long time I got tired, and I did not like go there like before. I think I have not learnd any more since I went there.
Second, I believe, people have to thrive with their job. if you can not improve your ability or your skills in your workday, it does not worth to continue. I think, different types of tasks are challenging, and when you face new tasks, you try to learn new thing to use in your task. In my opinion, doing varied types of tasks is the best way to improve your ability and skills. one of my friends, started to work in a rich company after graduation, every day he facaed new things. Although, he had not know about that task, he serfed the net, and tried to solve his problems with reading other articles and solutions. he had a high motivate to finish his tasks, and he has been learning new skills since he went there.
All in all, different tasks has more benefit for us, so had I different job opportunities, I would choice the one which has different types of tasks.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: This
this topic has always been a controvesial su...
^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: First
...ng reasons to support my position. first, I think for starting work doing simiar...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 112, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: If
..., but after a while it becomes borring. if at first you have incentive for doing t...
^^
Line 5, column 235, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: When
...ou will lose your motivation gradually. when I started my job in my brothers office,...
^^^^
Line 9, column 58, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: If
..., people have to thrive with their job. if you can not improve your ability or you...
^^
Line 9, column 380, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: One
...way to improve your ability and skills. one of my friends, started to work in a ric...
^^^
Line 9, column 504, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error -- use past participle here: 'known'.
Suggestion: known
...facaed new things. Although, he had not know about that task, he serfed the net, and...
^^^^
Line 9, column 620, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: He
...h reading other articles and solutions. he had a high motivate to finish his tasks...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, may, second, so, while, i think, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 15.1003584229 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 9.8082437276 41% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 13.8261648746 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 11.0286738351 36% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 51.0 43.0788530466 118% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 52.1666666667 77% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.0752688172 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1488.0 1977.66487455 75% => OK
No of words: 330.0 407.700716846 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.50909090909 4.8611393121 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.26214759535 4.48103885553 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.32949113019 2.67179642975 87% => OK
Unique words: 177.0 212.727598566 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.536363636364 0.524837075471 102% => OK
syllable_count: 450.0 618.680645161 73% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 12.0 9.59856630824 125% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 10.0 1.86738351254 536% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 20.6003584229 73% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.1344086022 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.1236670899 48.9658058833 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.2 100.406767564 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.0 20.6045352989 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.13333333333 5.45110844103 76% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 8.0 5.5376344086 144% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 11.8709677419 76% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.318116083943 0.236089414692 135% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0988798795829 0.076458572812 129% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.085612658858 0.0737576698707 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.196388160759 0.150856017488 130% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0255350106391 0.0645574589148 40% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.8 11.7677419355 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 66.07 58.1214874552 114% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.1575268817 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.88 10.9000537634 81% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.07 8.01818996416 88% => OK
difficult_words: 49.0 86.8835125448 56% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 10.002688172 90% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.0537634409 107% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.