Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? It is better to make friends with intelligent people than with the people who have a good sense of humor.
Since people have undeniable effects on each other, it is vitally important for each person to select some excellent individuals as his friends. Although a plethora of people hold the opinion that the main characteristic of a friend is to be clever, others disagree with this point of view and believe that having a sense of humor is more crucial. Although a certain conclusion cannot be made, I, to a great extent, hold the former viewpoint. Among countless reasons, which can vindicate my point of view, I will mention the two most conspicuous ones through the following paragraphs.
The first reason that juts out of my mind easily at the first moment of thinking about this issue is the fact that clever people always have some effective solution for all problems. They can easily evaluate all positive and negative aspects of an issue, and then make the best decision for it. Therefore, consulting with these intelligent people will lead to better results. To shed more light on this matter, the noteworthy statistics revealed by a recently conducted research in the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) shown that people who have clever friends are more successful in their lives, since they use their friends’ advice. In this study, scientists investigated two groups of people for three years. In one group, all members have intelligent friends, and the other group’s members have some normal friends. After investigation, the member of the former group would have gained more success than the latter. Consequently, the more clever friends someone has, the more benefit he will gain in his life.
The second and equally exquisite proof for this assertion is about this importance that clever individuals always have fantastic plans in their lives. In other words, they carry out all of their tasks in some particular manners, and manage their time more effectively. Making friend with such people is very useful since by doing so, you can learn how to manage your life as well as your time. To shed more light on this matter, when I was in Tehran, studying engineering, I had a clever friend. He had a perfect plan for his assignments, and accomplish each task in its time. Since he was very successful, I asked him to teach me how to manage my time and have a favorable schedule. Therefore, he helped me, and after a while, I had a great plan for my daily life. Hence, making friends with him completely changed my life. As it is clear, having clever friends is very profitable.
To make a long story short, based on the aforementioned arguments, we may draw the conclusion that it can be more advantageous for human beings if they choose their friends between intelligent people. This contention is due to the fact that not only do clever persons have spectacular advice but also others can learn a great host of things from them. Consequently, it is highly recommended that individuals select some intelligence as their friends.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 449, Rule ID: A_UNCOUNTABLE[5]
Message: Uncountable nouns are usually not used with an indefinite article. Use simply 'recently conducted research'.
Suggestion: recently conducted research
..., the noteworthy statistics revealed by a recently conducted research in the Massachusetts Institute of Techn...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, hence, if, may, second, so, then, therefore, well, while, in conclusion, as well as, in other words, to a great extent
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 15.1003584229 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 9.8082437276 112% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 13.8261648746 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.0286738351 109% => OK
Pronoun: 61.0 43.0788530466 142% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 58.0 52.1666666667 111% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.0752688172 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2462.0 1977.66487455 124% => OK
No of words: 498.0 407.700716846 122% => OK
Chars per words: 4.9437751004 4.8611393121 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.72397222731 4.48103885553 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73509013616 2.67179642975 102% => OK
Unique words: 258.0 212.727598566 121% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.518072289157 0.524837075471 99% => OK
syllable_count: 751.5 618.680645161 121% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 13.0 9.59856630824 135% => OK
Article: 6.0 3.08781362007 194% => OK
Subordination: 8.0 3.51792114695 227% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 5.0 1.86738351254 268% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 12.0 4.94265232975 243% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 24.0 20.6003584229 117% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.1331560281 48.9658058833 102% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.583333333 100.406767564 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.75 20.6045352989 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.25 5.45110844103 115% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 23.0 11.8709677419 194% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.85842293907 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.88709677419 20% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.243942442928 0.236089414692 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.071936934636 0.076458572812 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0797898193653 0.0737576698707 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.148240676457 0.150856017488 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.044534824045 0.0645574589148 69% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 11.7677419355 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 58.1214874552 103% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.1575268817 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.37 10.9000537634 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.02 8.01818996416 100% => OK
difficult_words: 107.0 86.8835125448 123% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 10.002688172 135% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.