Some people think the media including newspapers, televisions, radio and internet sources are less concerned about the accuracy of news. They think the information from the media is becoming incorrect.
Do you agree or disagree?
Media is one of the most crucial factors in our society. Genuinely, it has an undeniable role in human beings’ awareness. This issue weather or not how much its information are reliable has engendered copious controversies among people. Although a certain conclusion cannot be made, I, to a considerable extent, hold this viewpoint that it has precise information. Among countless reasons, which can vindicate my point of view, I will mention the two most conspicuous ones through the following paragraphs.
The first reason that juts out of my mind easily at the first moment of thinking about this issue is the fact that there are a great deal of surveillance on this kind of information. In other words, a large number of professionals check the precision of this data, and control its reliability. To shed more light on this matter, in my home town, Kerman city, 100 journalists are working as news channel staffs, and their duties are controlling the news and investigating its correction. Therefore, it is impossible that news’ sources release erroneous data and deceive people.
The second and equally exquisite proof for this assertion is about this importance that nowadays a lot of phenomena take place all over the word every moment; therefore, it is impossible for individuals to ensue these events and their results by themselves. Therefore, they should trust some media, such as radio, internet and so forth. Furthermore, among a varieties of news’ sources, at least some of them report correct information; hence, people are able to recognize precise news. To shed more light on this matter, a few weeks ago an accident happened in a highway in my country, and all media was taking about it but gave different data. I did a research in the internet and found the correct information easily.
To make a long story short, based on the aforementioned arguments, we may draw the conclusion that news that people can pursue through the media, are not erroneous. This contention is due to the fact that not only do this information control accurately but also this media is the only way that persons can enhance their knowledge about the events that happen in other places.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 134, Rule ID: THERE_RE_MANY[3]
Message: Possible agreement error. Did you mean 'deals'?
Suggestion: deals
...ssue is the fact that there are a great deal of surveillance on this kind of informa...
^^^^
Line 2, column 199, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
...is kind of information. In other words, a large number of professionals check the precision of th...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 128, Rule ID: ALL_OVER_THE_WORD[1]
Message: Did you mean 'all over the world' (=globally)?
Suggestion: all over the world
... nowadays a lot of phenomena take place all over the word every moment; therefore, it is impossib...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 357, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'a variety' or simply 'varieties'?
Suggestion: a variety; varieties
...ternet and so forth. Furthermore, among a varieties of news' sources, at least some of...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 657, Rule ID: A_UNCOUNTABLE[1]
Message: Uncountable nouns are usually not used with an indefinite article. Use simply 'research'.
Suggestion: research
...about it but gave different data. I did a research in the internet and found the correct i...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, hence, if, may, second, so, therefore, at least, in conclusion, kind of, such as, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 15.1003584229 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 9.8082437276 71% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 13.8261648746 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.0286738351 100% => OK
Pronoun: 45.0 43.0788530466 104% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 52.1666666667 82% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.0752688172 161% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1838.0 1977.66487455 93% => OK
No of words: 365.0 407.700716846 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.03561643836 4.8611393121 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.37092360658 4.48103885553 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86640030416 2.67179642975 107% => OK
Unique words: 213.0 212.727598566 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.583561643836 0.524837075471 111% => OK
syllable_count: 570.6 618.680645161 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 9.59856630824 94% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.94265232975 182% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.6003584229 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.1344086022 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.8021655024 48.9658058833 112% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.875 100.406767564 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.8125 20.6045352989 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.9375 5.45110844103 146% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.5376344086 90% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 11.8709677419 67% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.166851597718 0.236089414692 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.055926514713 0.076458572812 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0510890730507 0.0737576698707 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0994212501104 0.150856017488 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0488662143931 0.0645574589148 76% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 11.7677419355 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 58.1214874552 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.1575268817 117% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.25 10.9000537634 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.71 8.01818996416 109% => OK
difficult_words: 92.0 86.8835125448 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.002688172 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.0537634409 107% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.