TPO37
Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Because people are busy doing so many different things, they do very few things well.
It is very crucial for human beings to accomplish their tasks without any mistakes. Genuinely, how many duties that people implement correctly determines their level of responsibility. Although a plethora of people hold the opinion that people who do several various things have better performances, others disagree with this point of view. I, to a great extent, hold this viewpoint that doing sundry activities would decline a person’s performances. Among countless reasons, which can vindicate my point of view, I will mention the two most conspicuous ones through the following paragraphs.
The first reason that juts out of my mind easily at the first moment of thinking about this issue is the fact that people who accomplish similar activities, have well-organized minds. These individuals have excellent schedules for each day of their lives and never become dazed. Therefore, the level of their concentration is very high, and they have powerful minds. To give a tangible example, the noteworthy statistics revealed by a recently conducted research in the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) revealed that well organized people are be able to make perfect decisions in serious situations, which is very helpful in their jobs and today’s lives. Consequently, the less varieties in someone’s tasks, the more he will benefit.
The second and equally exquisite proof for this assertion is about this importance that accomplishing resembling tasks decline the amount of someone’s stress. Since the amount of anxiety, which is imposed on a person, has a direct relationship with human beings health, people with low level of anxiety, would have impeccable bodies and great lifestyles. To shed more light on this matter, consider a man who has a hectic lifestyle. Beyond a shadow of a doubt, he endures a great deal of pressure and stress because of his duties. Therefore, after a while, he will become nerves and sick, and he will not be able to implement his activities as well as he did in the past. Hence, it is highly recommended that all people should not do different things.
To make a long story short, based on the aforementioned arguments, we may draw the conclusion that individuals should fulfil similar things. This contention is due to the fact that by doing so, not only would they be physically and mentally in a better position, but also they are be able to do their duties with a little fault. As it is clear, the more various tasks that someone has to do, the less profit he will receive.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 433, Rule ID: A_UNCOUNTABLE[5]
Message: Uncountable nouns are usually not used with an indefinite article. Use simply 'recently conducted research'.
Suggestion: recently conducted research
..., the noteworthy statistics revealed by a recently conducted research in the Massachusetts Institute of Techn...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 687, Rule ID: FEWER_LESS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'fewer'? The noun varieties is countable.
Suggestion: fewer
...d today's lives. Consequently, the less varieties in someone's tasks, the ...
^^^^
Line 3, column 260, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'beings'' or 'being's'?
Suggestion: beings'; being's
...n, has a direct relationship with human beings health, people with low level of anxiet...
^^^^^^
Line 4, column 281, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'been'.
Suggestion: been
...in a better position, but also they are be able to do their duties with a little f...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, hence, if, may, second, so, therefore, well, while, as to, as well as, to a great extent
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 15.1003584229 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 9.8082437276 122% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 13.8261648746 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 17.0 11.0286738351 154% => OK
Pronoun: 43.0 43.0788530466 100% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 52.1666666667 96% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.0752688172 99% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2124.0 1977.66487455 107% => OK
No of words: 417.0 407.700716846 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.09352517986 4.8611393121 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.5189133491 4.48103885553 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92622945267 2.67179642975 110% => OK
Unique words: 226.0 212.727598566 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.541966426859 0.524837075471 103% => OK
syllable_count: 647.1 618.680645161 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 9.59856630824 83% => OK
Article: 8.0 3.08781362007 259% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.94265232975 162% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.2030249282 48.9658058833 113% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.789473684 100.406767564 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.9473684211 20.6045352989 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.31578947368 5.45110844103 116% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.5376344086 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 11.8709677419 118% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.88709677419 20% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.212795627086 0.236089414692 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.061284200157 0.076458572812 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0636564603515 0.0737576698707 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.13219069331 0.150856017488 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0430388462586 0.0645574589148 67% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 11.7677419355 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 58.1214874552 86% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.1575268817 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.24 10.9000537634 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.43 8.01818996416 105% => OK
difficult_words: 99.0 86.8835125448 114% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.002688172 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.