Some people think the media including newspapers, televisions, radio and internet sources are less concerned about the accuracy of news. They think the information from the media is becoming incorrect.
Do you agree or disagree?
Media is one of the most crucial factors in our society. Genuinely, it has an undeniable role on human beings awareness. This issue weather or not how much its information are reliable has engendered copious controversies among people. Although a certain conclusion cannot be made, I, to a considerable extent, hold this viewpoint that it has precise information. Among countless reasons, which can vindicate my point of view, I will mention the two most conspicuous ones through the following paragraphs.
The first reason that juts out of my mind easily at the first moment of thinking about this issue is the fact that there are a great deal of surveillance on this kind of information. In other words, a large number of professionals check the precision of this data, and control its reliability. To shed more light on this matter, in my home town, Kerman city, 100 journalists are working as news channel staffs, and their duties are controlling the news and investigating its correction. Therefore, it is impossible that news’ sources release erroneous data and deceive people.
The second and equally exquisite proof for this assertion is about this importance that nowadays a lot of phenomena take place all over the word every moment; therefore, it is imposible for indifiduals to ensue these events and their results by themselves. Therefore, they should trust some medias, such as radio, internet and so forth. To shed more light on this matter,
To make a long story short, based on the aforementioned arguments, we may draw the conclusion that news that people can pursue through the media, are not erroneous. This contention is due to the fact that not only do this information control accurately but also this media is the only way that persons can enhance their knowledge about the events that happen in other places.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 104, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'beings'' or 'being's'?
Suggestion: beings'; being's
...ely, it has an undeniable role on human beings awareness. This issue weather or not ho...
^^^^^^
Line 2, column 134, Rule ID: THERE_RE_MANY[3]
Message: Possible agreement error. Did you mean 'deals'?
Suggestion: deals
...ssue is the fact that there are a great deal of surveillance on this kind of informa...
^^^^
Line 2, column 199, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
...is kind of information. In other words, a large number of professionals check the precision of th...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 128, Rule ID: ALL_OVER_THE_WORD[1]
Message: Did you mean 'all over the world' (=globally)?
Suggestion: all over the world
... nowadays a lot of phenomena take place all over the word every moment; therefore, it is imposibl...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 372, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...orth. To shed more light on this matter, To make a long story short, based on the...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, may, second, so, therefore, in conclusion, kind of, such as, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 15.1003584229 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 9.8082437276 71% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 13.8261648746 65% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.0286738351 100% => OK
Pronoun: 41.0 43.0788530466 95% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 52.1666666667 65% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.0752688172 136% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1539.0 1977.66487455 78% => OK
No of words: 305.0 407.700716846 75% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.04590163934 4.8611393121 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17902490978 4.48103885553 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82951769464 2.67179642975 106% => OK
Unique words: 187.0 212.727598566 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.613114754098 0.524837075471 117% => OK
syllable_count: 472.5 618.680645161 76% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 9.59856630824 83% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 20.6003584229 63% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.1344086022 114% => OK
Sentence length SD: 60.1990780169 48.9658058833 123% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.384615385 100.406767564 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.4615384615 20.6045352989 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.46153846154 5.45110844103 137% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.5376344086 90% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 11.8709677419 59% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.12777174648 0.236089414692 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0444189912474 0.076458572812 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0400818534265 0.0737576698707 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0753348724806 0.150856017488 50% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0329194568012 0.0645574589148 51% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 11.7677419355 120% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 58.1214874552 97% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.1575268817 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.31 10.9000537634 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.07 8.01818996416 113% => OK
difficult_words: 83.0 86.8835125448 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.002688172 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.0537634409 111% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.