Tpo55-preventing from desertification
The main idea of the reading and lecture is both about stand against desertification with some method. The author of the reading feels that setting device for collecting water from vapor in the air cannot be successful, and provide 3 reasons for that. The lecturer, on the other hand, utterly challenges this claims made by the author. He is of opinion that the author's reasons isn't convincing and provide three reason to elaborate that.
To begin with, the author argues that the cost of this device for each tree is so much, approximately 25$ for each tree. For getting good effects governments must apply this device for millions of tree, so they can afford it. This specific argument is challenged by lecturer. He claims that this device is reusable. After one tree grew, we can remove device and use for another tree. At this way, costs can be reasonable.
Secondly, the writer suggest that we can use local people to set this with their own money, but their economic situation is not good. They can't even cope with animal’s food costs. The lecturer, however, refute this by elaborating that this method has extra benefits for local people. He claims that they can use this device for other plants like vegetation’s. They can grow more food. Also, when trees got grew, they can use large Branch’s to set a fire wok.
Finally, the author of writing states that in this areas there is no rain sometimes even for six month, as a result when they trees grew enough, they need water to being alive. The lecture oppose with by bringing up that this young trees have long root, so their roots can reach to moist soil and provide their needed water from that. Consequently, they can grow without rain. For example, in Sahara desert some trees grew with this method and after two years that the device was removed, these tress are still healthy.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 253, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...essful, and provide 3 reasons for that. The lecturer, on the other hand, utterly ch...
^^^
Line 1, column 379, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: isn't
... is of opinion that the authors reasons isnt convincing and provide three reason to ...
^^^^
Line 5, column 103, Rule ID: CURRENCY[1]
Message: The currency mark is usually put at the beginning of the number: '$25'.
Suggestion: $25
...for each tree is so much, approximately 25$ for each tree. For getting good effects...
^^^
Line 9, column 140, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
...ir economic situation is not good. They cant even cope with animal's food costs...
^^^^
Line 13, column 47, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...y, the author of writing states that in this areas there is no rain sometimes even f...
^^^^
Line 13, column 98, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'month' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'months'.
Suggestion: months
...there is no rain sometimes even for six month, as a result when they trees grew enoug...
^^^^^
Line 13, column 127, Rule ID: NON3PRS_VERB[2]
Message: The pronoun 'they' must be used with a non-third-person form of a verb: 'tree'
Suggestion: tree
...en for six month, as a result when they trees grew enough, they need water to being a...
^^^^^
Line 13, column 490, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this tress' or 'these tresses'?
Suggestion: this tress; these tresses
... two years that the device was removed, these tress are still healthy.
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, finally, however, if, second, secondly, so, still, for example, as a result, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.4613686534 115% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 5.04856512141 238% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 7.0 7.30242825607 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 12.0772626932 124% => OK
Pronoun: 45.0 22.412803532 201% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 36.0 30.3222958057 119% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.01324503311 80% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1552.0 1373.03311258 113% => OK
No of words: 323.0 270.72406181 119% => OK
Chars per words: 4.80495356037 5.08290768461 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.23936324884 4.04702891845 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.38555690142 2.5805825403 92% => OK
Unique words: 181.0 145.348785872 125% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.560371517028 0.540411800872 104% => OK
syllable_count: 459.9 419.366225166 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.55342163355 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 3.25607064018 338% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.25165562914 240% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 1.51434878587 132% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 2.5761589404 194% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 13.0662251656 153% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 21.2450331126 75% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 43.326781556 49.2860985944 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 77.6 110.228320801 70% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.15 21.698381199 74% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.7 7.06452816374 95% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 8.0 4.19205298013 191% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 4.33554083885 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 4.45695364238 135% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.27373068433 164% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0282186845448 0.272083759551 10% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.00962330138928 0.0996497079465 10% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0233504191535 0.0662205650399 35% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0240140143555 0.162205337803 15% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0286866479411 0.0443174109184 65% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.3 13.3589403974 70% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 72.16 53.8541721854 134% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.2 11.0289183223 65% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.26 12.2367328918 84% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.46 8.42419426049 89% => OK
difficult_words: 62.0 63.6247240618 97% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.7273730684 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.498013245 80% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.2008830022 71% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.