Both the reading and the listening discuss the archeological discovery of the precious old artifacts and their preservation in the United Kingdom. The author believes that there are three possible obstacles that limit this process. The lecturer challenges the claims made by the author. She states that the new enforced rules in 1990, have improved the situation and overcome the mentioned obstacles.
To begin with, the author suggests that all the significant increase in the population resulted in increasing the constructions at the expense of the archeological artifacts. The lecturer challenges this specific argument by asserting that the new rule requires examination of any sites before starting constructions. If the site contains valuable artifacts, the builders and archeologists will make a plan to preserve the precious artifacts. And also they can build around the site without losing any valuables. Thus, This rule prevents any loss in the artifacts.
Secondly, the writer argues that the available budget for archeological research is very limited and only the governments support this kind of projects. The lecturer, however, rebuts this claim by explaining that the new guidance overcame this problem by asking the construction companies to pay for the initial examination and all the work requested. Based on this new funding, the archeologists are allowed to do more research than before. Finally, the author posits that it is very hard to be an archeologist and this specific job is not readily available in Britain. In contrast, the lecturer casts doubts on this point by pointing out that archeologists are required to be hired in all stages and the companies pay them well. Archeologists get involved in many tasks including examination of the site, making preservation plans, doing research and
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 311, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e by the author. She states that the new enforced rules in 1990, have improved th...
^^
Line 2, column 261, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... by asserting that the new rule requires examination of any sites before starting...
^^
Line 2, column 565, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...rule prevents any loss in the artifacts. Secondly, the writer argues that the ava...
^^^^
Line 3, column 442, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...allowed to do more research than before. Finally, the author posits that it is ve...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 577, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...job is not readily available in Britain. In contrast, the lecturer casts doubts o...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, however, if, second, secondly, so, thus, well, in contrast, kind of, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 10.4613686534 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 5.04856512141 40% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 7.30242825607 137% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 12.0772626932 75% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 23.0 22.412803532 103% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 30.3222958057 112% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 5.01324503311 199% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1556.0 1373.03311258 113% => OK
No of words: 287.0 270.72406181 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.42160278746 5.08290768461 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11595363751 4.04702891845 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.06110996237 2.5805825403 119% => OK
Unique words: 166.0 145.348785872 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.578397212544 0.540411800872 107% => OK
syllable_count: 469.8 419.366225166 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 3.25607064018 61% => OK
Article: 10.0 8.23620309051 121% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 13.0662251656 92% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 21.2450331126 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 85.0601094651 49.2860985944 173% => OK
Chars per sentence: 129.666666667 110.228320801 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.9166666667 21.698381199 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.5 7.06452816374 120% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 4.09492273731 73% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 5.0 4.19205298013 119% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 4.45695364238 135% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.27373068433 23% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0332057298215 0.272083759551 12% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0129901554751 0.0996497079465 13% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0196696325994 0.0662205650399 30% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0230076996791 0.162205337803 14% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.00405141625332 0.0443174109184 9% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.1 13.3589403974 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 53.8541721854 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.0289183223 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.45 12.2367328918 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.62 8.42419426049 114% => OK
difficult_words: 88.0 63.6247240618 138% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.7273730684 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.498013245 107% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum four paragraphs wanted. The correct pattern:
para 1: introduction
para 2: doubt 1
para 3: doubt 2
para 4: doubt 3
Less contents wanted from the reading passages(25%), more content wanted from the lecture (75%).
Don't need a conclusion paragraph.
Read sample essays from ETS:
http://www.testbig.com/users/toeflwritingmaster
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.