In the United States, medical information about patients traditionally has been recorded and stored on paper forms. However, there are efforts to persuade doctors to adopt electronic medical record systems in which information about patients is stored in electronic databases rather than on paper. It is argued that storing patients' medical records in electronic databases has several advantages over traditional paper-based record keeping.
Reducing Costs
First, the use of electronic records can help reduce costs by saving money on storing and transferring medical records. While paper records require a significant amount of storage space, electronic medical records take up virtually no space. Moreover, by having patients' records computerized in databases, doctors can easily access the records from almost anywhere and can easily duplicate and transfer them when necessary. This costs much less than copying, faxing, or transporting paper records from one location to another.
Preventing Errors
Second, electronic medical records are crucial to reducing the chances of medical errors. Illegible handwriting, improper transcription of data, and nonstandard organization of paper records have caused errors that in some cases have had serious consequences for the patients' health. In contrast, electronic records are associated with standardization of forms and legible computer fonts and thus minimize the possibility of human error.
Aiding Research
Third, electronic medical records can greatly aid medical research by making it possible to gather large amounts of data from patient records. It is often impractical, impossible, or prohibitively expensive to manually go through thousands of patients’ paper records housed in doctors' offices. However, with the existence of electronic medical records, it would be simple to draw out the needed information from the medical databases because the databases are already formatted for data collection. Once in the electronic system, the records could be accessed from any research location.
The reading and the lecture are both about electonic medical databases. The reading states that electronic database have several advantages rather than traditional paper-based record keeping. However, the lecturer says that all of the author's claims are uncertain and refutes each of the author's claims.
First of all, the article states that Electronic records can decline the cost of copying, faxing or transporting paper records from one place to another. in this article said that recording data helps for the doctor to easily access, duplicated and transfer them. This argument is challenged by the lecturer. He says that doctor needed emegency back of dada and it is not possible for the doctor to access any information without any special permission. Moreover, the lctuer says that for authenticity needed doctor's signaturer and needed strong cost for obtain any records. thus, this argument does not bring any wter.
Second of all, electronic records could minimize the possibility of human error. In addition, uses of the electronic record, prevented serious consiquences for a patent that would happen any handmade report. In contrast, the lecturer position is that still happen some error because office staff interpreat between doctor's report and computer records. He elaborates on this point that doctors record patent history and other symptoms and some notes by hand and then patent collected any added computer record. Hence, misinterpret still happen because doctor poor writing notes staff collect.
Finally, the reading suggests that electronic medical record helps for many research location to access. Furthermore, the reading posits that manuaaly thousands of patients records impossible, thus able easily to collect records as electrocin record. The lecturer, however, rebuts this claim that the researcher must be needed to follow privacy law to research any record. Moreover, the lecturer says that in Usa not only doctors to privatize their patents record also needed some patent permission if anyone trying to access.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 225, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
...eeping. However, the lecturer says that all of the authors claims are uncertain and refute...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 155, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: In
...aper records from one place to another. in this article said that recording data h...
^^
Line 5, column 576, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Thus
...ded strong cost for obtain any records. thus, this argument does not bring any wter....
^^^^
Line 13, column 72, Rule ID: MANY_NN_U[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun research seems to be uncountable; consider using: 'much research', 'a good deal of research'.
Suggestion: much research; a good deal of research
...hat electronic medical record helps for many research location to access. Furthermore, the re...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, furthermore, hence, however, if, moreover, second, so, still, then, thus, in addition, in contrast, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 10.4613686534 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 5.04856512141 79% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 7.30242825607 137% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 12.0772626932 108% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 22.412803532 103% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 30.3222958057 96% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.01324503311 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1749.0 1373.03311258 127% => OK
No of words: 315.0 270.72406181 116% => OK
Chars per words: 5.55238095238 5.08290768461 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.21286593061 4.04702891845 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.54526370872 2.5805825403 99% => OK
Unique words: 178.0 145.348785872 122% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.565079365079 0.540411800872 105% => OK
syllable_count: 534.6 419.366225166 127% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.55342163355 109% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 3.25607064018 123% => OK
Article: 10.0 8.23620309051 121% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 13.0662251656 138% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 21.2450331126 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 34.8285483157 49.2860985944 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.1666666667 110.228320801 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.5 21.698381199 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.72222222222 7.06452816374 109% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 4.19205298013 95% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 4.33554083885 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 4.45695364238 179% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.27373068433 94% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.227477656249 0.272083759551 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0729843370326 0.0996497079465 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0504108238489 0.0662205650399 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.141401218417 0.162205337803 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0341957908321 0.0443174109184 77% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 13.3589403974 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.76 53.8541721854 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.0289183223 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.61 12.2367328918 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.24 8.42419426049 110% => OK
difficult_words: 95.0 63.6247240618 149% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 10.7273730684 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.498013245 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.