The passage and lecture discuss about the potential benefits and harms of profesors appearing on the television shows. The reading states that the appearance on TV is highly beneficial to students,professors,university and also to the public. The passage gives 3 reasonings for the above claim. However , the professor in the lecture refutes all the 3 reasoning and says all are unwarranted reasonings.
Firstly, the reading posits that the professors reputation/importance will be enhanced as their TV appearance and professors idea can reach wider number of audience.The lecture contradicts by saying that its not the case, in fact the professor will be attributed as not a serious scholar among peers as they often think these professors are wasting time on TV rather than on serious research.
Secondly, the reading claims that universities will get great publicity which will lead to increased donations and more applications to said university. The professors denies this as well by saying that since the professors are not actually participating in real reasearch as they will be wasting more time on travel, makeup, pre-presentation preparation for TVs ; which will lead to professors getting lesser donations for their research. Also the professors may not may not have enough time to help and discuss with existing students. Side effects can be reduced number of applications.
Finally, the passage boldly presents that public will learn great deal of learning and get real insights from the expertise of professors . The lecture contrasts this view as well. The lecture states that the TV talks dont look for deep views rather they will present the superficial knowledge and only bold incendiary titles which can benefit the channels and thier movies. Hence , lecture indirectly states that the professor's talk on the TV show may not be benefical after all.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 197, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , professors
...e on TV is highly beneficial to students,professors,university and also to the public. The ...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 244, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...sors,university and also to the public. The passage gives 3 reasonings for the abov...
^^^
Line 1, column 303, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
... reasonings for the above claim. However , the professor in the lecture refutes al...
^^
Line 3, column 38, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'professors'' or 'professor's'?
Suggestion: professors'; professor's
... Firstly, the reading posits that the professors reputation/importance will be enhanced ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 166, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: The
...idea can reach wider number of audience.The lecture contradicts by saying that its ...
^^^
Line 5, column 169, Rule ID: AGREEMENT_SENT_START[1]
Message: You should probably use 'deny'.
Suggestion: deny
...ions to said university. The professors denies this as well by saying that since the p...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 286, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...icipating in real reasearch as they will be wasting more time on travel, makeup, ...
^^
Line 5, column 372, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...presentation preparation for TVs ; which will lead to professors getting lesser d...
^^
Line 5, column 422, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...d to professors getting lesser donations for their research. Also the professors ...
^^
Line 5, column 444, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Also,
...g lesser donations for their research. Also the professors may not may not have eno...
^^^^
Line 5, column 464, Rule ID: PHRASE_REPETITION[1]
Message: This phrase is duplicated. You should probably leave only 'may not'.
Suggestion: may not
...for their research. Also the professors may not may not have enough time to help and discuss wi...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 127, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... get real insights from the expertise of professors . The lecture contrasts this ...
^^
Line 7, column 139, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...sights from the expertise of professors . The lecture contrasts this view as well...
^^
Line 7, column 220, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...l. The lecture states that the TV talks dont look for deep views rather they will pr...
^^^^
Line 7, column 382, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...fit the channels and thier movies. Hence , lecture indirectly states that the prof...
^^
Discourse Markers used:
['actually', 'also', 'but', 'finally', 'first', 'firstly', 'hence', 'however', 'look', 'may', 'second', 'secondly', 'so', 'well', 'after all', 'in fact']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.264797507788 0.261695866417 101% => OK
Verbs: 0.146417445483 0.158904122519 92% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0809968847352 0.0723426182421 112% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0747663551402 0.0435111971325 172% => OK
Pronouns: 0.018691588785 0.0277247811725 67% => OK
Prepositions: 0.121495327103 0.128828473217 94% => OK
Participles: 0.0342679127726 0.0370669169778 92% => OK
Conjunctions: 3.27280381946 2.5805825403 127% => OK
Infinitives: 0.018691588785 0.0208969081088 89% => OK
Particles: 0.0 0.00154638098197 0% => OK
Determiners: 0.105919003115 0.128158765124 83% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0436137071651 0.0158828679856 275% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.00934579439252 0.0114777025283 81% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 1879.0 1645.83664459 114% => OK
No of words: 299.0 271.125827815 110% => OK
Chars per words: 6.28428093645 6.08160592843 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1583189471 4.04852973271 103% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.367892976589 0.374372842146 98% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.301003344482 0.287516216867 105% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.200668896321 0.187439937562 107% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.167224080268 0.113142543107 148% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.27280381946 2.5805825403 127% => OK
Unique words: 159.0 145.348785872 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.531772575251 0.539623497131 99% => OK
Word variations: 54.254050113 53.8517498576 101% => OK
How many sentences: 13.0 13.0529801325 100% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 21.7502111507 106% => OK
Sentence length SD: 95.8434991607 49.3711431718 194% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 144.538461538 132.220823453 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.0 21.7502111507 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.23076923077 0.878197800319 140% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 15.0 3.39072847682 442% => Correct essay format wanted or double check grammar & spelling issues after essay writing.
Readability: 53.1003344482 50.5018328374 105% => OK
Elegance: 1.75324675325 1.90840788429 92% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.148498263584 0.549887131256 27% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.124413416944 0.142949733639 87% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0650675123686 0.0787303798458 83% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.616333488364 0.631733273073 98% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.189189567839 0.139662658121 135% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0621720773365 0.266732575781 23% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0571314434662 0.103435571967 55% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.392035918664 0.414875509568 94% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0203202923342 0.0530846634433 38% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.109647918262 0.40443939384 27% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0295293412797 0.0528353158467 56% => The ideas may be duplicated in paragraphs.
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 4.33554083885 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.26048565121 70% => OK
Positive topic words: 6.0 3.49668874172 172% => OK
Negative topic words: 3.0 3.62251655629 83% => OK
Neutral topic words: 3.0 3.1766004415 94% => OK
Total topic words: 12.0 10.2958057395 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.