We have observed a gradual increase of the sea level during the last decades. It is a slow increase, and despite the alarmist attitudes of some, it is nothing to be worried about. By analyzing the data and looking into the matter clearly, we can find that this is a normal process that has happened before.
Even though we have documented a rise in the polar ice melting, this isn't the reason for the increase in the sea level. That ice is already in the water, so it displaces it already. Think of ice cubes in your glass of water, when they melt it doesn't make the water from the glass spill over. The same thing happens when the ice cap melts. Since the Ice is 90% already in water, when it goes into a liquid state, nothing drastic happens.
When it comes to the source for the increase in the sea level, we just don't know where it comes from. Many scientific agencies like NASA have stated that they simply don't know from where all this new water is coming. So it is still a great unknown
The sea level has been fluctuating ever since the continents have emerged from the primordial ocean. We have seen many changes through the eons, half of our current landmass was submerged at one point. The same will probably happen later, and it will be through a slow and gradual process. Enough time will pass for humanity to adjust
The reading and lecture are about the current rise in sea level. The author of the reading feels that there is no reason to be worried, as this just usual case that has been seen before. The lecturer challenges the claims by the author. She is of the opinion that it is matter to be cautious and something needs to be done.
To begin with the author argues that, since most of the world's ice is already in water it constitues to the sea level's rise. Hence melting of ice and glaciers is not the reason for the recent increase in sea level. The specific argument is challenged by the lecturer. She claims the current effect on the sea level is because of the melting of permafrost, and the melting is not the important factor here. Additionally, she says that it is the matter of caution because the permafrost is not the part of the sea. It is a part of land that melts and then goes on to be a part of the sea and consequently contributing to the rise in sea level.
Secondly, the writer suggest that the source of increase in sea level is not known. In the article, it is said scientists from NASA have also do not know the reason behind the effect. The lecturer, however, rebuts this by mentioning that even though NASA stated about the reason being not known to them as well, they clearly supported the claim about the permafrosts being melt. She elaborates in this by bringing up the point that the main reason being permafrost melting quickly is the current human activities.
Finally, the author posits that the sea level have been vacillating since the time continents emerged and observed these changes to continue gradually into the future. In contrast, the lecturer's position is that she denys the author's claims, as the since these permafrost have been frozen for thousands of years and suddenly if they are melting at such a pace is a matter of concern. She metions that the main reason for the melting is the everday increasing use of the fossil fuels and if this keeps on continuing then possibility is soon the 20 percent of our land will be in the water. Hence we don't have much time and need to act now and quickly to avoid the consequneces.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 188, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...t usual case that has been seen before. The lecturer challenges the claims by the a...
^^^
Line 2, column 126, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Hence,
...r it constitues to the sea levels rise. Hence melting of ice and glaciers is not the ...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 143, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error -- use past participle here: 'done'.
Suggestion: done
... is said scientists from NASA have also do not know the reason behind the effect. ...
^^
Line 4, column 256, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this permafrost' or 'these permafrosts'?
Suggestion: this permafrost; these permafrosts
... denys the authors claims, as the since these permafrost have been frozen for thousands of years...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 590, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Hence,
...rcent of our land will be in the water. Hence we dont have much time and need to act ...
^^^^^
Line 4, column 599, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...our land will be in the water. Hence we dont have much time and need to act now and ...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, finally, hence, however, if, second, secondly, so, then, well, in contrast, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 31.0 10.4613686534 296% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 5.04856512141 40% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 7.30242825607 151% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 12.0772626932 99% => OK
Pronoun: 34.0 22.412803532 152% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 55.0 30.3222958057 181% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 5.01324503311 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1770.0 1373.03311258 129% => OK
No of words: 393.0 270.72406181 145% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.50381679389 5.08290768461 89% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.45244063426 4.04702891845 110% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.42558378025 2.5805825403 94% => OK
Unique words: 181.0 145.348785872 125% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.460559796438 0.540411800872 85% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 543.6 419.366225166 130% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.55342163355 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 3.25607064018 246% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.25165562914 240% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 2.5761589404 155% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 13.0662251656 138% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 21.2450331126 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.4885438933 49.2860985944 98% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.3333333333 110.228320801 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.8333333333 21.698381199 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.33333333333 7.06452816374 90% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 4.19205298013 143% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 4.33554083885 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 4.45695364238 135% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.27373068433 140% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.214886023997 0.272083759551 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0716057355335 0.0996497079465 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0425150283975 0.0662205650399 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.135201623018 0.162205337803 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0150867371358 0.0443174109184 34% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.7 13.3589403974 80% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 67.08 53.8541721854 125% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.0289183223 83% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.82 12.2367328918 72% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.81 8.42419426049 93% => OK
difficult_words: 78.0 63.6247240618 123% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 10.7273730684 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.498013245 99% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.2008830022 71% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.