What effect does the information provided in the listening passage have on the situation presented in the reading passage?
In this set of material, the reading passage mentioned some problems with the Sociology Department of Satate University. In this passage mentioned some changes after of several meetings. While, in the listenig mentioned one change in the curriculm specially.One change is two curses more to the new students and other change is the decrease in the selection of curses by the students.
In the reading passage mentioned the best solution to the negative comments, for example, change the curriculm of the department to obtain a major in sociology, While in the listening passage mentioned that the prinsipla change is the offert of curses, to be precise five curses. Two curses wil be requirement and three curses will be selected by the student, this is the new change, decrese the number curses that the student could select.
On the other hand, in the listening passage mentioned other rule, the new students in the Sociology Department will have these changes but the students in this program don´t have these riquerements.
But in the reading passage mentioned that all students will be afected by the new changes.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 199, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...While in the listening passage mentioned that the prinsipla change is the offert ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, so, while, for example, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 10.4613686534 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 5.04856512141 79% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 7.30242825607 55% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 12.0772626932 25% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 9.0 22.412803532 40% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 30.3222958057 92% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.01324503311 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 929.0 1373.03311258 68% => OK
No of words: 184.0 270.72406181 68% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.04891304348 5.08290768461 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.68302321012 4.04702891845 91% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.58859443034 2.5805825403 100% => OK
Unique words: 75.0 145.348785872 52% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.407608695652 0.540411800872 75% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 295.2 419.366225166 70% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 3.25607064018 0% => OK
Article: 0.0 8.23620309051 0% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 1.0 13.0662251656 8% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 184.0 21.2450331126 866% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 0.0 49.2860985944 0% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 929.0 110.228320801 843% => Less chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 184.0 21.698381199 848% => Less words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 46.0 7.06452816374 651% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 4.33554083885 23% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 4.45695364238 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.27373068433 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.146862122895 0.272083759551 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.146862122895 0.0996497079465 147% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0662205650399 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.121829170766 0.162205337803 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0260774815126 0.0443174109184 59% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 94.4 13.3589403974 707% => Automated_readability_index is high.
flesch_reading_ease: -115.28 53.8541721854 -214% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 0.0 5.55761589404 0% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 75.1 11.0289183223 681% => Flesch kincaid grade is high.
coleman_liau_index: 13.19 12.2367328918 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 15.94 8.42419426049 189% => OK
difficult_words: 37.0 63.6247240618 58% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 54.0 10.7273730684 503% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 75.6 10.498013245 720% => Gunning_fog is high.
text_standard: 76.0 11.2008830022 679% => The average readability is very high. Good job!
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.