Whether's Chevalier memoir were true or not
The reading passage and the lecture, both discuss the trusthworthy of chevalier's writings. In the reading part, the author mentiones that his memoir was excaturated because of the three main reasons: first, he was poor, second, the conversation that was recorded wrote many years after the acurate time, third, the matter of escaping from prison. In the listening part, however, the speaker castes serious doubt on what the author mentioned and refutes the reasons.
To begin with, as mentioned in the article, the author sets forth that chevalier said his was wealthy, in contrast, he borrowed money from a wealthy man. Nevertheless, the lecture rebuts the reasons, assorting that achieving to his own money considered lots of time, hence distances. he did not access to the cash, as a result of that he had to borrow the money for a while.
Secondly, the author points out there is a doubtive evidence that conversation between chevalier and Voltaire actually existed. it was write many years later and it could not possible to write it with such an accuarate and relevant detail. however, the speaker flatly contradicts and contends that conversation wrote immediately after that happened and chevalier recorded it that night in his diaries. it provides a proof to the fact that he could rememmber it easily after passing years by referring to his notes. Indeed, composing movements confirmed this idea.
third, the author claims that he could not run away from prison of venice, offering a bribe from his friends. Using just a piece of metal is more likely to stories that might be taile and rarely happent in the real world. On the other hand, the lecturer postulates that it is undenable that he had powerful friends in venice, but, there is a seriuse evidence that demonstrate it accsident is true; aftre escaping, ceiling was ripaired at that time.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 285, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: He
...nsidered lots of time, hence distances. he did not access to the cash, as a result...
^^
Line 9, column 129, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: It
...hevalier and Voltaire actually existed. it was write many years later and it could...
^^
Line 9, column 136, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'written'.
Suggestion: written
...r and Voltaire actually existed. it was write many years later and it could not possi...
^^^^^
Line 9, column 241, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: However
... such an accuarate and relevant detail. however, the speaker flatly contradicts and con...
^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 403, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: It
... recorded it that night in his diaries. it provides a proof to the fact that he co...
^^
Line 13, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Third
...ing movements confirmed this idea. third, the author claims that he could not ru...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, but, first, hence, however, nevertheless, second, secondly, so, third, while, in contrast, as a result, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.4613686534 115% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 5.04856512141 79% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 7.30242825607 110% => OK
Relative clauses : 16.0 12.0772626932 132% => OK
Pronoun: 38.0 22.412803532 170% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 37.0 30.3222958057 122% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.01324503311 100% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1568.0 1373.03311258 114% => OK
No of words: 310.0 270.72406181 115% => OK
Chars per words: 5.05806451613 5.08290768461 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.19604776685 4.04702891845 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.58149985846 2.5805825403 100% => OK
Unique words: 172.0 145.348785872 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.554838709677 0.540411800872 103% => OK
syllable_count: 473.4 419.366225166 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 3.25607064018 154% => OK
Article: 11.0 8.23620309051 134% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 2.5761589404 194% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 13.0662251656 107% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 21.2450331126 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.0078487012 49.2860985944 106% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.0 110.228320801 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.1428571429 21.698381199 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.4285714286 7.06452816374 148% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 4.19205298013 143% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 4.33554083885 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.27373068433 164% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0693844811273 0.272083759551 26% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0235944698164 0.0996497079465 24% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0286838089254 0.0662205650399 43% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0407298674086 0.162205337803 25% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0126379961012 0.0443174109184 29% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 13.3589403974 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 53.8541721854 107% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.0289183223 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.07 12.2367328918 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.85 8.42419426049 105% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 63.6247240618 127% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 10.7273730684 126% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.498013245 103% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.2008830022 125% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.