The world’s forests are facing increasing pressure which, if left unchecked, will threaten the health of many industries, economies, nations, and lives. The development of an international fund to help developing countries implement useful conservation techniques in forest protection is the best way to protect the world’s forests and hopefully reverse negative trends that imperil our forests.
Using the internationally established forest protection fund to protect forest agriculture is perhaps the most important initiative. Dispersing these funds to governments, land owners, and farmers will allow them to resist intrusions by the logging industry, oil companies, and property developers who are after their land. This is a very specific initiative that will help agricultural areas from being developed into environmentally damaging industries and ensure that agricultural farm use is uninterrupted.
A second use of this protection fund could be used to develop the economies of villages and tribal communities located in forest areas. By parceling out funds to provide villagers and tribal residents of forests with a stipend will help these people continue their way of life and resist pressure to convert their forest land to the above mentioned industries. Providing living stipends and other financial aid to forest residents will help people afford education, health services, and nutritional aid so that they are less tempted to resort to destructive or exploitative forest practices to make a living. Much of the global concern with deforestation focuses on the alarming loss of biodiversity. Humans use thousands of species of plants and animals on a daily basis for food, shelter, clothing and medicinal needs. Deforestation threatens species that humans rely on for these essential services. Using the international fund to help governments and people establish protected forest areas is the best way to maintain valuable forest biodiversity and protect species from exploitation, endangerment and extinction.
In an effort to protect forests and biodiversity, the development of an international fund will help the countries to use techniques for the conservation of forests. This act can reduce the tranformation of forests to industries. However, it is unlikely that international fund will help in protecting forests and in maintaining biodiversity.
First of all, the reading passage mentions about dispersing the funds to governments, land owners, and farmers will help them in agricultural farming. However, agricultural farming is itself a destructive force to the environment. Farmers uses the modern agricultural techniques that specifically includes the use of fertilizers and pesticides which leads to deforestation and water pollution.
Secondly, the reading passage mentions that this protection fund will used to develop the economies of villagers and tribals living in forest areas. In addition, this fund will act as living stipends which will help them in dealing with financial problems, education, nutrition, etc. However, paying the villagers is not a solution. The international funds will be provided to government and will disperse to farmers. However, there is no guarantee that this fund will reach to villagers. Government may not use this funds appropriately.
In conclusion, the lecture provide a better solution to this problem by encouraging for planting for trees.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 9, column 71, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'will' requires the base form of the verb: 'use'
Suggestion: use
...mentions that this protection fund will used to develop the economies of villagers a...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, may, second, secondly, so, in addition, in conclusion, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 10.4613686534 48% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 5.04856512141 218% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 7.0 7.30242825607 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 12.0772626932 50% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 14.0 22.412803532 62% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 30.3222958057 92% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 5.01324503311 239% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1192.0 1373.03311258 87% => OK
No of words: 209.0 270.72406181 77% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.7033492823 5.08290768461 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.80221413058 4.04702891845 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.29664030109 2.5805825403 128% => OK
Unique words: 112.0 145.348785872 77% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.535885167464 0.540411800872 99% => OK
syllable_count: 355.5 419.366225166 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.55342163355 109% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 3.25607064018 92% => OK
Article: 5.0 8.23620309051 61% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 13.0662251656 99% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 21.2450331126 75% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 41.3419854786 49.2860985944 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 91.6923076923 110.228320801 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.0769230769 21.698381199 74% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.69230769231 7.06452816374 95% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.27373068433 140% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.274738261681 0.272083759551 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.10344677926 0.0996497079465 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0930730517258 0.0662205650399 141% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.155764383813 0.162205337803 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.125608450316 0.0443174109184 283% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 13.3589403974 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.78 53.8541721854 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.0289183223 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.48 12.2367328918 127% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.34 8.42419426049 111% => OK
difficult_words: 65.0 63.6247240618 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.7273730684 103% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.498013245 80% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.2008830022 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.