zebra
The reading passage and lecture have a conflicting opinion about whether or not the black and white vertical stripes of zebras are protection colour. The article strongly postulates that those verticals help them to escape readily from their natural enemies without much efforts such as lions and wolves. On the other hand, the listening adamantly delineates that those proofs don’t give any satisfactory explanation of it so those supporting points given by the author are irrelevant information.
First and foremost, according to the author of the excerpt, vertical strips cause optical illusions which are confusing the predators view in many possible ways also it means that bewildering the real distance between them so zebras can escape easily from their enemies. Nonetheless, the professor offsets these points by declaring that flesh-eating animals stalk to their prey in silence instead of doing a sudden jump.
On top of this, the professor in the listening elaborates by bringing up the point that biological researchers say that predators don’t trouble to pick out one zebra from a horde and target on it without any problem. These claims refute the writer’s implications which is about the protection colour help them to hide among the flock, especially in time of danger also it is complicated to distinguish an individual from their flock.
The text lastly insists that zebras usually graze in tall grasses area so they can mix with their surrounding environment smoothly. The speaker In the lecture counters these indications by asserting that in actually the environment can’t play a role to hide from the predators because zebras graze in open plain area and they haven’t any habit to cover so it isn’t possible to disguise from their natural enemies.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 66, Rule ID: WHETHER[7]
Message: Perhaps you can shorten this phrase to just 'whether'. It is correct though if you mean 'regardless of whether'.
Suggestion: whether
...ecture have a conflicting opinion about whether or not the black and white vertical stripes of...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 267, Rule ID: MUCH_COUNTABLE[1]
Message: Use 'many' with countable nouns.
Suggestion: many
...dily from their natural enemies without much efforts such as lions and wolves. On th...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, first, lastly, nonetheless, so, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 10.4613686534 48% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 5.04856512141 59% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 7.30242825607 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 12.0772626932 83% => OK
Pronoun: 31.0 22.412803532 138% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 44.0 30.3222958057 145% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 5.01324503311 160% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1520.0 1373.03311258 111% => OK
No of words: 285.0 270.72406181 105% => OK
Chars per words: 5.33333333333 5.08290768461 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10876417139 4.04702891845 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80503438717 2.5805825403 109% => OK
Unique words: 168.0 145.348785872 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.589473684211 0.540411800872 109% => OK
syllable_count: 470.7 419.366225166 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.55342163355 109% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 3.25607064018 31% => OK
Article: 7.0 8.23620309051 85% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 13.0662251656 69% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 31.0 21.2450331126 146% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 54.8432108631 49.2860985944 111% => OK
Chars per sentence: 168.888888889 110.228320801 153% => OK
Words per sentence: 31.6666666667 21.698381199 146% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.22222222222 7.06452816374 116% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 4.33554083885 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.27373068433 47% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.175554027448 0.272083759551 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0816913778904 0.0996497079465 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0760970550571 0.0662205650399 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.111992164058 0.162205337803 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0297836166045 0.0443174109184 67% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 19.5 13.3589403974 146% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 31.55 53.8541721854 59% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 5.55761589404 202% => Smog_index is high.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 16.6 11.0289183223 151% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.23 12.2367328918 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.33 8.42419426049 111% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 63.6247240618 118% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 10.7273730684 135% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.4 10.498013245 137% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.2008830022 134% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.