In many organizations, perhaps the best way to approach certain new projects is to assemble a group of people into a team. Having a team of people attack a project offers several advantages. First of all, a group of people has a wider range of knowledge, expertise, and skills than any single individual is likely to possess. Also, because of the numbers of people involved and the greater resources they possess, a group can work more quickly in response to the task assigned to it and can come up with highly creative solutions to problems and issues. Sometimes these creative solutions come about because a group is more likely to make risky decisions that an individual might not undertake. This is because the group spreads responsibility for a decision to all the members and thus no single individual can be held accountable if the decision turns out to be wrong.
Taking part in a group process can be very rewarding for members of the team. Team members who have a voice in making a decision will no doubt feel better about carrying out the work that is entailed by that decision than they might doing work that is imposed on them by others. Also, the individual team member has a much better chance to “shine,” to get his or her contributions and ideas not only recognized but recognized as highly significant, because a team’s overall results can be more far-reaching and have greater impact than what might have otherwise been possible for the person to accomplish or contribute working alone.
You have 20 minutes to plan and write your response. Your response will be judged on the basis of the quality of your writing and on how well your response presents the points in the lecture and their relationship to the reading passage. Typically, an effective response will be 150 to 225 words.
The article states that working a team is imperative to achieve a new plan and provides three compelling reasons for support. however, the professor explains that the project performing about 6 months which time it is recognized that free riders are very prevalent on the units but the whole team did excellent on this job and refutes each of the author's reasons.
First of all, the reading claims that selves of group workers have great mixture knowledge and surpassing experience that aids to reach the determination more abruptly and it may highly trigger an imaginative solution for each issues confronting with them. that the staff's position isn't good as expected it. Furthermore, they don't reach the decision on account of the fact that they organize too many meeting is about whereby to move the profit over and over again.
Secondly, the article posits that if they work as a team, they may not blame each other due to making the wrong resolution. Moreover, the entire group take duty not each individual. however, the lecturer states that influential personalities of the team said that working as a group is crucial.
Third, the reading says that taking responsibility is an awesome award for each worker. Since conveying own voice in making an arrangement won't make a doubt to carry out the part of work and they may feel having the opportunity to "shine". Opposes this point by explaining that some workers just ignore the rest of the other own team workers.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 127, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: However
...s three compelling reasons for support. however, the professor explains that the projec...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 258, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: That
... for each issues confronting with them. that the staffs position isnt good as expect...
^^^^
Line 3, column 283, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: isn't
...ing with them. that the staffs position isnt good as expected it. Furthermore, they ...
^^^^
Line 3, column 327, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
... good as expected it. Furthermore, they dont reach the decision on account of the fa...
^^^^
Line 5, column 183, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: However
...re group take duty not each individual. however, the lecturer states that influential p...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, furthermore, however, if, may, moreover, second, secondly, so, third, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 10.4613686534 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 5.04856512141 59% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 7.30242825607 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 12.0772626932 108% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 22.412803532 103% => OK
Preposition: 24.0 30.3222958057 79% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.01324503311 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1245.0 1373.03311258 91% => OK
No of words: 249.0 270.72406181 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.0 5.08290768461 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.97237131171 4.04702891845 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71317763549 2.5805825403 105% => OK
Unique words: 154.0 145.348785872 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.618473895582 0.540411800872 114% => OK
syllable_count: 376.2 419.366225166 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 3.25607064018 92% => OK
Article: 7.0 8.23620309051 85% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 13.0662251656 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 21.2450331126 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 62.993899744 49.2860985944 128% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.181818182 110.228320801 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.6363636364 21.698381199 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.54545454545 7.06452816374 121% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 4.19205298013 119% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 4.33554083885 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.27373068433 23% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.125212146071 0.272083759551 46% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0460316296823 0.0996497079465 46% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.033749870542 0.0662205650399 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0752776261725 0.162205337803 46% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0289036228869 0.0443174109184 65% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 13.3589403974 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 53.8541721854 107% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.0289183223 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.02 12.2367328918 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.91 8.42419426049 106% => OK
difficult_words: 66.0 63.6247240618 104% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 18.0 10.7273730684 168% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.498013245 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.2008830022 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 90.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 27.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.