Should airlines impose price floors and price ceilings for airfares? Why or why not?
Developing of economics put Government takes some laws to manage. Nowadays, we can choose many types of vehicles to travel or go somewhere, like motorbike, car. Train. The airplane is one of the best ways to choose. In 2017, Viet Nam’s Government offered airlines should impose price floors and price ceilings for airfares. In my opinion, I think we should not do that.
Firstly, this is not benefits with the government. It doesn’t help them to manage marketing. It just makes Government become dictatorial in citizen’s eyes. This policy doesn’t encourage develop naturally. It influences to tax. Because price ceilings make airlines do not decide price higher and the government gets a big amount of tax from that.
Secondly, it influences negatively with Airlines. Price floors make them do not use price to attend their customers. On holidays, price ceilings are barriers and they can’t receive more benefits because of that. They must invest in different things to attend their customers. Somethings are not necessary will be invested, for instance, luxury furniture in the airplane. It wastes money. Airlines can lose their customers because of price floors. Although it’s a price floor, it’s still expensive with many people, and they will decide to choose another vehicle instead of an airplane.
Finally, it’s a disadvantage with consumers. When we don’t have price floors, airlines have to compete to have customers. Decreasing the price of airfares is an easy choice. Consumers will receive benefits from that. When Government imposes price floors and price ceilings for airfares, airlines can’t decrease price lower than prices floors. Consumers don’t have any benefits from that. What does happen if price ceilings and price floors are too high? For example, when we don’t use that policy, because of competition, we can buy an airfare with 1.000.000 dong. Now, when we have 6.000.000 dong for price ceilings and 2.000.000 dong for prices floors. Airlines give 2.000.000 dong for airfare, it’s still higher than before.
In conclusion, I think we should not impose price floors and price ceilings for airfares. It’s not good for Government, airlines or consumers. We should encourage healthy competition between airlines. They find a comfortable price in each position.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, firstly, if, second, secondly, so, still, for example, for instance, i think, in conclusion, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 34.0 24.0651302605 141% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1995.0 1615.20841683 124% => OK
No of words: 364.0 315.596192385 115% => OK
Chars per words: 5.48076923077 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.36792674256 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77855111067 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 180.0 176.041082164 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.494505494505 0.561755894193 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 603.9 506.74238477 119% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 14.0 5.43587174349 258% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 7.0 2.10420841683 333% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 33.0 16.0721442886 205% => Too many sentences.
Sentence length: 11.0 20.2975951904 54% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 30.1516217449 49.4020404114 61% => OK
Chars per sentence: 60.4545454545 106.682146367 57% => More chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 11.0303030303 20.7667163134 53% => More words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 3.69696969697 7.06120827912 52% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 16.0 3.4128256513 469% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.389916598402 0.244688304435 159% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.107676063095 0.084324248473 128% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.140072710635 0.0667982634062 210% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.257618700376 0.151304729494 170% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0951249505019 0.056905535591 167% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.9 13.0946893788 76% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 51.85 50.2224549098 103% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.8 11.3001002004 78% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.32 12.4159519038 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.78 8.58950901804 91% => OK
difficult_words: 83.0 78.4519038076 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 4.0 9.78957915832 41% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 6.4 10.1190380762 63% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.33 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.