which one do you choose?
governments spend money on public transportation or Internet access
There is no shortage of debates whether it is better for governments to allot more budget for services that include all society. In this regard, some individuals hold the view that it is of vital importance to enhance internet access. However, there are other opinions that it is essential to pay attention to public transportation. I am personally inclined to believe that the former idea pales in comparison to the latter. In the following paragraphs, some persuasive reasons have been elaborated in order to elucidate some obscure points in this framework.
The first pivotal reason which exhorted me to opt for this viewpoint is that it is worth to pay attention to public health. These days, air pollution is the most important issue of cities. Considering the point that the consequence of air pollution is damage to the public health, it is crucial for every government to find the solution for this obstacle. Vividly, the mentioned point can be reached by reducing hazardous gases that are emitted in the air by using fossil fuel. Mitigating the use of personal automobiles and boosting public transportation is a vital solution. It is worth mentioning that allowing the budget for improving public transportation paved the way for this goal. By way of illustration, in Tehran, my hometown, we faced inversion for air that is a cause for air pollution every autumn and winter. For solving this problem, the municipality decided to enhance the budget for buying more buses and improving subways. As a result, people motivated to use these kinds of transporting methods instead of using their own automobiles. So, the more public attention, the healthier environment.
The other equally cogent reason which corroborating my stance is that parts of the population of a country use the Internet. Even many of them do not have enough knowledge for using it. It is crystal clear that governments should spend the money on services that they are more popular and pragmatic. By way of illustration, since the last decade, the government has been made lots of internet centers in the villages all around the country. In these villages, people's daily habits are caring for their domesticated animals. They have never used this technology. So, providing these services for these villages was a waste of time and money.
By perusing the above paragraphs, one can infer that although public transportation is vital for daily access, improving them yields much better outcome for societies. For the sake of brevity, a couple of points are worth reiterating: first, the effect of this action on public health; secondly; benefits for most of the people.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, second, secondly, so, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 24.0 13.1623246493 182% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 15.0 7.30460921844 205% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 45.0 24.0651302605 187% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 52.0 41.998997996 124% => OK
Nominalization: 22.0 8.3376753507 264% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2220.0 1615.20841683 137% => OK
No of words: 435.0 315.596192385 138% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.10344827586 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.56690854021 4.20363070211 109% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85854096363 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 224.0 176.041082164 127% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.514942528736 0.561755894193 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 702.0 506.74238477 139% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 9.0 2.52805611222 356% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.76152304609 189% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 24.0 16.0721442886 149% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.5463764809 49.4020404114 68% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.5 106.682146367 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.125 20.7667163134 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.04166666667 7.06120827912 29% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 3.4128256513 234% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.176452166573 0.244688304435 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0507622323551 0.084324248473 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0454482495505 0.0667982634062 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.109899921036 0.151304729494 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.026796960882 0.056905535591 47% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.7 13.0946893788 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.0 12.4159519038 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.85 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 119.0 78.4519038076 152% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.