Of all the Fortune 500 companies, only 4% have female CEOs. The government should change policy so that women make up an equal 50% of executive business positions.
To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement? Discuss why you chose that position with some examples.
Equality for women in business has been sought for long time. Only 4% of women are working as a CEOs in Fortune 500 companies. Some individuals believe that the government should enforce a policy in order to bring equality by involving 50% of women in executive business positions. This essay will argue both sides of the argument and will give my opinion.
The government should be fair enough while introducing any policy in business. The allotment of positions in any any organization should be based on the required talent rather than on the gender. For instance, if the regulatory body will make such policy to place 50% of women in executive business positions then the deserving male candidates will be despair because of the unfair treatment. Sudden influx of 50% women in Fortune organizations will lead to an inappropriate talent fulfillment if it will be not based on the talent and experience.
On the contrary, government can indeed bring equality in business world by employing 50% of female in executive business positions but only if they are well deserving. The women who are truly deserving and well experienced should of course get a chance to prove themselves, which may get done by the introduction of government policy for equality. However, Just to make a equal ratio of men and women in business world, government should not ignore the desired criteria for executive positions in companies.
This essay discussed how government need to be judicious while making such policy of women equality in business world which should not impact both men and women in any context. In my view, the sudden inflow of women in executive business positions will demoralize the men's potential and it would not be feasible.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 109, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: any
...business. The allotment of positions in any any organization should be based on the req...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 149, Rule ID: PROGRESSIVE_VERBS[1]
Message: This verb is normally not used in the progressive form. Try a simple form instead.
...ive business positions but only if they are well deserving. The women who are truly deserving and ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 182, Rule ID: PROGRESSIVE_VERBS[1]
Message: This verb is normally not used in the progressive form. Try a simple form instead.
... they are well deserving. The women who are truly deserving and well experienced should of course g...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 370, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...icy for equality. However, Just to make a equal ratio of men and women in busines...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, may, so, then, well, while, for instance, of course, in my view, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 17.0 6.10837438424 278% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 7.0 8.36945812808 84% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 5.94088669951 67% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 9.0 20.9802955665 43% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 31.9359605911 132% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 5.75862068966 243% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1446.0 1207.87684729 120% => OK
No of words: 288.0 242.827586207 119% => OK
Chars per words: 5.02083333333 5.00649968141 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11953428781 3.92707691288 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77763020441 2.71678728327 102% => OK
Unique words: 137.0 139.433497537 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.475694444444 0.580463131201 82% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 472.5 379.143842365 125% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 4.6157635468 43% => OK
Article: 4.0 1.56157635468 256% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 1.71428571429 58% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.65517241379 55% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 12.6551724138 103% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.5024630542 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.8864046334 50.4703680194 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.230769231 104.977214359 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.1538461538 20.9669160288 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.53846153846 7.25397266985 104% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.33497536946 75% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 6.9802955665 86% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 2.91625615764 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.271804686912 0.242375264174 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.115847330708 0.0925447433944 125% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0670962879047 0.071462118173 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.188995504118 0.151781067708 125% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0467485205195 0.0609392437508 77% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 12.6369458128 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 53.1260098522 93% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.9458128079 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.84 11.5310837438 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.91 8.32886699507 95% => OK
difficult_words: 58.0 55.0591133005 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.94827586207 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.3980295567 104% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.5123152709 114% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 72.2222222222 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 65.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.