Of all the Fortune 500 companies, only 4% have female CEOs. The government should change policy so that women make up an equal 50% of executive business positions. To what extent do you agree or disagree.
Equality for women in business has been sought since the beginning of humankind. Today, merely four percent of the women are the CEOs of the world's largest companies. This essay will discuss the reasons why the government should legislate to maintain a minimum amount of women's contribution in the management positions, but may not require to mandate it up to fifty percent.
Nowadays, even talented women may not have an opportunity because of the discrimination pervade across the organisation. To avoid this, the government should enforce the rules to maintain a minimum level of women involvement in the management sector. For instance, the authority can impose a new law that the organisations must welcome at least 25% of the top management contribution from the female. While enacting the lowest requirement, it will assure that the most talented female employees may involve in the top business management seats.
On the other hand, women always have the feminine essence in their activities. As a consequence, Involving fifty percent of women into the governing sector may impact negatively in critical business decisions. To put forth an example, a recent study has shown that women are in delay than men when taking the crucial decisions. Therefore, uplifting the women into top positions will become an obstacle when deciding the imperative organisation conclusions.
This essay discussed that how the government policy change will support the skilled women to present in the top management seats in the companies but the negative consequences can arise at any point. In my opinion, organisations might miss the skilled employees in the higher positions if they tend to remain to underutilise the female workers and therefore the bottom level of 25 percent of female representation must be legalised.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 21, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'worlds the largest'.
Suggestion: worlds the largest
...rcent of the women are the CEOs of the worlds largest companies. This essay will discuss the ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 220, Rule ID: ALLOW_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'mandating'? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, 'require' + 'to' takes an object, usually a pronoun.
Suggestion: mandating
...nagement positions, but may not require to mandate it up to fifty percent. Nowadays, ev...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 427, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...om the female. While enacting the lowest requirement, it will assure that the mos...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, may, so, therefore, while, at least, for instance, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 10.5418719212 38% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 6.10837438424 246% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 3.0 8.36945812808 36% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 5.94088669951 101% => OK
Pronoun: 12.0 20.9802955665 57% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 31.9359605911 122% => OK
Nominalization: 19.0 5.75862068966 330% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1538.0 1207.87684729 127% => OK
No of words: 288.0 242.827586207 119% => OK
Chars per words: 5.34027777778 5.00649968141 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11953428781 3.92707691288 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.96311396461 2.71678728327 109% => OK
Unique words: 164.0 139.433497537 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.569444444444 0.580463131201 98% => OK
syllable_count: 494.1 379.143842365 130% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 4.6157635468 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.71428571429 117% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 12.6551724138 103% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.5024630542 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.5345834366 50.4703680194 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.307692308 104.977214359 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.1538461538 20.9669160288 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.07692307692 7.25397266985 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.12807881773 121% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.33497536946 56% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 6.9802955665 57% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 2.75862068966 217% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.185584932849 0.242375264174 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0688628887326 0.0925447433944 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0293782448997 0.071462118173 41% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.106784533511 0.151781067708 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0138267274892 0.0609392437508 23% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.8 12.6369458128 117% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 53.1260098522 77% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 10.9458128079 120% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.69 11.5310837438 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.17 8.32886699507 110% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 55.0591133005 147% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.94827586207 116% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.3980295567 104% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.5123152709 133% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.