Artifically intelligent robots are increasingly taking human jobs.some people believe that eventually all work will be done by robots. other believe that there is a limit to the tasks that robots can performs

Human employment is decreasing as artificially intelligent robots are taking over human jobs. Certain section of people observe that all work in future will be performed by robots, whereas others feel that robots will have limitation in the type of tasks they can execute. This essay will discuss why robots can perform most of the work there by replacing human jobs.

In future, most of the work done by humans can be easily performed by artificially intelligent robots causing depletion in jobs performed by human. Increase in machine processing power in recent times has helped in developing faster deep learning algorithms which is assisting machines to make faster and efficient decisions. For example, robots in car manufacturing industry are replacing factory workers as they don't get tired and have very less error rate. As a result of these factors, artificial intelligent robots are eating away the employment share of humans.

However, some people don't believe that robots will ever reach to a level where they can compete with humans in the jobs they perform. These set of people are unaware of how rapidly computers are evolving and are playing a major role in next industrial revolution. It is just a matter of time before computers can program themselves. Even the most complex jobs such as medicine and education will be mechanized.

Over the years, Artificially intelligent robots are replacing human workforce rapidly. In my opinion, the pace at which robots are replacing humans, it is only a matter of time where there will be more robots than human workforce in almost every industry.

Votes
Average: 8 (1 vote)
Essay Categories

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'In the future'?
Suggestion: In the future
... work there by replacing human jobs. In future, most of the work done by humans can be...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 415, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...y are replacing factory workers as they dont get tired and have very less error rate...
^^^^
Line 6, column 22, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...are of humans. However, some people dont believe that robots will ever reach to ...
^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, so, whereas, for example, such as, as a result, in my opinion

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 10.5418719212 152% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 6.10837438424 180% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 8.36945812808 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 5.94088669951 118% => OK
Pronoun: 14.0 20.9802955665 67% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 31.9359605911 106% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.75862068966 122% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1356.0 1207.87684729 112% => OK
No of words: 263.0 242.827586207 108% => OK
Chars per words: 5.15589353612 5.00649968141 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.02706775958 3.92707691288 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.66409985522 2.71678728327 98% => OK
Unique words: 147.0 139.433497537 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.558935361217 0.580463131201 96% => OK
syllable_count: 441.0 379.143842365 116% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.71428571429 58% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.65517241379 82% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 12.6551724138 103% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.5024630542 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.4573188081 50.4703680194 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.307692308 104.977214359 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.2307692308 20.9669160288 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.69230769231 7.25397266985 78% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.33497536946 56% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 6.9802955665 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.462824854231 0.242375264174 191% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.157003010744 0.0925447433944 170% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.115843938317 0.071462118173 162% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.276044776295 0.151781067708 182% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.129672766016 0.0609392437508 213% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 12.6369458128 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 53.1260098522 80% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.9458128079 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.65 11.5310837438 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.95 8.32886699507 107% => OK
difficult_words: 72.0 55.0591133005 131% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.94827586207 111% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.3980295567 96% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.5123152709 124% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 72.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.